Induction and maintenance of mucosal healing in Crohn's disease with ustekinumab in clinical practice across all care levels in Germany (MUCUS).

Ulrike von Arnim, Andreas Stallmach, Andreas Fischer, Daniel Schmidt, Jürgen Stein, Daniel C Baumgart, Stefanie Howaldt, Philip Grunert, Stefan Schubert, Thomas Ochsenkühn, Andreas Lügering, Marten Schulz

Journal: Scientific reports 2024;14(1):20502

PMID: 39227642

Abstract

The impact of ustekinumab (UST) on mucosal- and fistula healing and extraintestinal manifestations (EIM) in Crohn's disease (CD) were not fully elucidated in the registration trials. In this prospective, multicenter study (EudraCT number: 2017-005151-83) we evaluated the German label real-world-effectiveness of UST to achieve the primary endpoint of combined clinical and endoscopic response at week 52 and several secondary endpoints. Of 79 screened we enrolled 52 patients (female n = 28, bionaïve n = 13, biologic n = 39). At week 52 (per protocol analysis), 52% (n = 13/25) of patients achieved the primary endpoint [50% (n = 3/6) in the bionaïve, 45.5% (n = 5/11) biologic, 62.5% (n = 5/8 ) multiple biologics cohorts, respectively with age as independent predictor [OR 95% CI 0.933 (0.873, 0.998) p = 0.043], 60% (n = 15/25) achieved endoscopic response [50% (n = 3/6) in the bionaïve, 54.5% (n = 6/11) biologic, 75% (n = 6/8) multiple biologics cohorts, respectively], 36% (n = 9/25) achieved endoscopic remission [50% (n = 3/6) in the bionaïve, 27.3% (n = 3/11) biologic, 37.5% (n = 3/8) multiple biologics cohorts, respectively], 48% (n = 12/25) achieved mucosal healing [50% (n = 3/6) in the bionaïve, 36.4% (n = 4/11) biologic, 62.5% (n = 5/8) multiple biologics cohorts, respectively]. All achieved a fistula response and 33.3% (n = 1/3) in the multiple biologics group fistula remission at week 52. EIM decreased (week 0 28.2% vs. week 52 8%). CRP, FCP, PRO-2, EQ-5D-5L improved throughout. 36 patients (69.2%) experienced ≥ 1 treatment emergent adverse event, in 8 (15.4%) cases rated as severe and in 5 (9.6%) leading to UST discontinuation, but no very severe events or deaths. The effectiveness of UST was better than in the registration trials.

© 2024. The Author(s).

Address: Medizinische Klinik m.S. Hepatologie und Gastroenterologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. [email protected].; Klinik für Innere Medizin IV Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie, Zentrale Endoskopie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany.; Gastroenterologie am Bayerischen Platz, Gastroenterologie, Berlin, Germany.; Hamburgisches Forschungsinstitut für chronisch entzündliche Darmerkrankungen, Immunologie, Hamburg, Germany.; Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Universitätsklinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie, Magdeburg, Germany.; Isarklinikum, Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Gastroenterologische Onkologie, München, Germany.; DGD Kliniken Frankfurt Sachsenhausen, Abteilung Gastroenterologie/Ernährungsmedizin, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.; MVZ Portal 10, Zentrum für Leber-, Magen- und Darmerkrankungen, Münster, Germany.; Medizinische Klinik m.S. Hepatologie und Gastroenterologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.