Kristine Ensrud, Susan Diem, Nancy Greer, Timothy J Wilt, Mary L Forte, Adrienne Landsteiner, Catherine Sowerby, Mary Butler, Maylen Anthony, Kristen E Ullman, Nicholas Zerzan, Elisheva R Danan
Journal: Annals of internal medicine 2024;177(10):1389-1399
PMID: 39250808
BACKGROUND
Women seeking nonhormonal interventions for vulvovaginal, urinary, and sexual symptoms associated with genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) may seek out complementary and alternative medicine or therapies (CAMs).
PURPOSE
To summarize published evidence of CAMs for GSM.
DATA SOURCES
Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL from inception through 11 December 2023.
STUDY SELECTION
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) 8 weeks or more in duration that evaluated the effectiveness or harms of CAMs for postmenopausal women with GSM and reported 1 or more outcomes of interest, with sample sizes of 20 or more participants randomly assigned per group.
DATA EXTRACTION
Data were abstracted by 1 reviewer and verified by a second.
DATA SYNTHESIS
An evidence map approach was used to organize and describe trials. Studies were organized by type of intervention, with narrative summaries for population, study characteristics, interventions, and outcomes. Fifty-seven trials were identified that investigated 39 unique interventions. Studies were typically small ( < 200), and most were done in Iran ( = 24) or other parts of Asia ( = 9). Few trials evaluated similar combinations of populations, interventions, comparators, or outcomes. Most studies ( = 44) examined natural products (that is, herbal or botanical supplements and vitamins), whereas fewer reported on mind and body practices ( = 6) or educational programs ( = 7). Most studies reported 1 or 2 GSM symptoms, mainly sexual ( = 44) or vulvovaginal ( = 30). Tools used to measure outcomes varied widely. Most trials reported on adverse events ( = 33).
LIMITATIONS
Only English-language studies were used. Effect estimates, risk of bias, and certainty of evidence were not assessed.
CONCLUSION
There is a large and heterogeneous literature of CAM interventions for GSM. Trials were small, and few were done in North America. Standardized population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes reporting in future RCTs are needed.
PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. (PROSPERO: CRD42023400684).
Full Text Sources:
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.