Beyond surgical resection: evaluating stereotactic brachytherapy iodine-125 for low-grade gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gabriel Verly, Sávio Batista, Raphael Bertani, Marianna Leite, Lucca B Palavani, Allan Dias Polverini, Pedro Borges, Luis Neto, Miguel Almeida, Leonardo B Oliveira, Leonardo de Macedo Filho, Wellingson Paiva

Journal: Neurosurgical review 2024;47(1):617

PMID: 39276262

Abstract

Stereotactic Brachytherapy Iodine-125 (SBT I-125) has been investigated by some studies for the treatment of lowgrade gliomas. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of SBT I-125 Brachytherapy for treatment of patients with Low-Grade Gliomas. PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases were searched for randomized and observational studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the Cochrane Collaboration and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement guidelines. We used relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals and random effects model to compare the effects of I-125 SBT treatment on the interest outcomes. We evaluated heterogeneity using I2 statistics; we considered heterogeneity to be significant if the p-value was less than 0.05 and I2 was higher than 35%. We performed statistical analysis using the software R (version 4.2.3). A total of 20 studies with a cohort of 988 patients with low grade gliomas who received SBT I-125 as a treatment option. The pooled analysis evidenced: (1) Complication rate of 10% (95% CI: 7-12%; I² = 60%); (2) 5-year PFS of 66% (99% CI: 45-86%; I²= 98%); (3) 10-year PFS was 66% (99% CI: 45-86%; I²= 98%); (4) Malignant transformation rate of 26% (95% CI: 8-45%; I²=0); (5) Mortality of 33% (95% CI: 15-51%; I² = 0%). Our systematic review and meta-analysis of SBT I-125 for low-grade gliomas have revealed significant concerns regarding its safety and efficacy. Despite a proportion of patients remaining progression-free, elevated rates of complications and mortality cast doubt on the intervention's reliability. Future research should prioritize long-term follow-up studies, standardized protocols, and comparative effectiveness research.

© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Address: Max Planck University Center, Rua Eurico Primo Venturine, 379, Jardim Pedroso, Indaiatuba, 13343-000, São Paulo, Brazil. [email protected].; Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.; Technical-Educational Foundation Souza Marques, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.; Universidade de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.; Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.; Faculty of Medicine Santa Marcelina, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.; State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil.; University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.; Neurosurgical Oncology Division, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil.; The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA.

Link outs

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.