Recognition vs resolution charts for defocus curve determination in trifocal intraocular lenses.

Alejandro Cerviño, Pedro Tañá-Rivero, Pedro Tañá-Sanz, Santiago Tañá-Sanz, Robert Montés-Micó

Journal: Journal of cataract and refractive surgery 2024;50(9):942-946

PMID: 38780434

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the impact of optotype choice on the determination of defocus curve in patients with cataract implanted with presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens (IOL).

SETTING

Oftalvist Alicante, Alicante, Spain.

DESIGN

Observational case-control study.

METHODS

Patients implanted with Asqelio Trifocal IOL participated in this study. Uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (VA) and subjective refraction were determined. Monocular defocus curves were obtained 6 months postoperatively with the Clinical Trial Suite system using either Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) or Landolt C charts under photopic conditions (85 cd/m 2 ), and range of vergence from +2.00 to -5.00 diopters (D) in 0.50 D steps.

RESULTS

A total of 49 patients were enrolled in the study, 24 in the ETDRS group (7 male, 17 female) and 25 in the Landolt C group (5 male, 20 female). Nonsignificant differences were found between patients conforming both groups, except for preoperative intraocular pressure and white-to-white distance. All patients were within ±1.00 D from intended refraction after surgery. 75% of patients in the ETDRS group and 84% in the Landolt C group were within ±0.50 D. Average difference between the groups across vergences provided by the defocus curve was 0.12 ± 0.05 logMAR units, significant for all vergences ( P < .05). Differences in VA were significant for distance, intermediate, and near between both groups, except for uncorrected distance VA.

CONCLUSIONS

Defocus curves created using Landolt C charts yield significantly lower through-focus outcomes than those created with standard ETDRS charts. This should be taken into account when comparing the performance of presbyopia-correcting systems across studies where recognition charts might have been used because of patient characteristics.

Copyright © 2024 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.

Address: From the Oftalvist Alicante, Alicante, Spain (Tañá-Rivero, P. Tañá-Sanz, S. Tañá-Sanz); Department of Optics and Optometry and Vision Science, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain (Montés-Micó, Cerviño).
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.