Medication and supplement pharmacokinetic changes following bariatric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

David Llewellyn, Caroline S Copeland, Marie-Philippe Morin, Nikhil Chandhyoke, Chris Harlow, Eve-Julie Tremblay, Alan Ramalho, Eduard Ostarijas, Dominika Okroj, Andre Tchernof, Royce P Vincent, Georgios K Dimitriadis, Marie-Eve Piché, Fannie Lajeunesse-Trempe, Nicholas W S Chew, Paul Poirier, Laurent Biertho

Journal: Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity 2024;25(8):e13759

PMID: 38710656

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of bariatric surgery on the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of orally administered medications and supplements.

METHODS

Systematic searches of bibliographic databases were conducted to identify studies. Pooled effect estimates from different surgical procedures were calculated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Quantitative data were synthesized from 58 studies including a total of 1985 participants. Whilst 40 medications and 6 supplements were evaluated across these studies, heterogeneity and missing information reduced the scope of the meta-analysis to the following medications and supplements: atorvastatin, paracetamol, omeprazole, midazolam, vitamin D, calcium, zinc, and iron supplements. There were no significant differences in PK parameters post-surgery for the drugs atorvastatin and omeprazole, and supplements calcium, ferritin, and zinc supplements. Paracetamol showed reduced clearance (mean difference [MD] = -15.56 L/hr, p = 0.0002, I = 67%), increased maximal concentration (MD = 6.90 μg/ml, p = 0.006, I = 92%) and increased terminal elimination half-life (MD = 0.49 hr, p < 0.0001, I = 3%) post-surgery. The remaining 36 medications and 2 supplements were included in a systematic review. Overall, 18 of the 53 drugs and supplements showed post-operative changes in PK parameters.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates heterogeneity in practice and could not reach conclusive findings for most PK parameters. Prospective studies are needed to inform best practice and enhance patient healthcare and safety following bariatric surgery.

© 2024 The Authors. Obesity Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of World Obesity Federation.

Address: Department of Endocrinology ASO/EASO COM, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, UK.; Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Canada.; Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.; Faculty of Medicine, J. J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia.; Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Canada.; Department of Endocrinology ASO/EASO COM, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, UK.; Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, National University Health System, Singapore.; Department of Clinical Biochemistry, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, UK.; Centre for Pharmaceutical Medicine Research, Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, London, UK.; Department of Endocrinology ASO/EASO COM, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, UK.; Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes and Immunometabolism Research Group, Faculty of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine & Sciences, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.