Biased receptor signalling and intracellular trafficking profiles of structurally distinct formylpeptide receptor 2 agonists.

Peishen Zhao, Cheng Xue Qin, Yung-Chih Chen, Jonathan Baell, Cheng Peng, Rebecca H Ritchie, Elizabeth A Vecchio, Anh T N Nguyen, Mia De Seram, Ruby Tang, Peter Keov, Owen L Woodman, Lauren T May

Journal: British journal of pharmacology 2024;181(22):4677-4692

PMID: 39154373

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is increasing interest in developing FPR2 agonists (compound 43, ACT-389949 and BMS-986235) as potential pro-resolving therapeutics, with ACT-389949 and BMS-986235 having entered phase I clinical development. FPR2 activation leads to diverse downstream outputs. ACT-389949 was observed to cause rapid tachyphylaxis, while BMS-986235 and compound 43 induced cardioprotective effects in preclinical models. We aim to characterise the differences in ligand-receptor engagement and downstream signalling and trafficking bias profile.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Concentration-response curves to G protein dissociation, β-arrestin recruitment, receptor trafficking and second messenger signalling were generated using FPR2 ligands (BMS-986235, ACT-389949, compound 43 and WKYMVm), in HEK293A cells. Log(τ/K) was obtained from the operational model for bias analysis using WKYMVm as a reference ligand. Docking of FPR2 ligands into the active FPR2 cryoEM structure (PDBID: 7T6S) was performed using ICM pro software.

KEY RESULTS

Bias analysis revealed that WKYMVm and ACT-389949 shared a very similar bias profile. In comparison, BMS-986235 and compound 43 displayed approximately 5- to 50-fold bias away from β-arrestin recruitment and trafficking pathways, while being 35- to 60-fold biased towards cAMP inhibition and pERK1/2. Molecular docking predicted key amino acid interactions at the FPR2 shared between WKYMVm and ACT-389949, but not with BMS-986235 and compound 43.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

In vitro characterisation demonstrated that WKYMVm and ACT-389949 differ from BMS-986235 and compound 43 in their signalling and protein coupling profile. This observation may be explained by differences in the ligand-receptor interactions. In vitro characterisation provided significant insights into identifying the desired bias profile for FPR2-based pharmacotherapy.

© 2024 The Author(s). British Journal of Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.

Address: Drug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.; Monash Victorian Heart Institute, Blackburn Road Clayton, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.; Medicinal Chemistry, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Vitoria, Australia.

Link outs

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.