Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Prevalence and Treatment Patterns for Neovascular Glaucoma in the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS® Registry.

Anne L Coleman, Fei Yu, Victoria L Tseng, Deyu Pan, Ken Kitayama

Journal: Ophthalmology. Glaucoma 2024;7(6):615-623

PMID: 39032697

Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine racial and ethnic differences in the prevalence and treatment patterns for neovascular glaucoma (NVG) in at-risk individuals in the American Academy of Ophthalmology (Academy) IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight).

DESIGN

Observational retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Eyes in the IRIS Registry with a retinal ischemia based on a history of proliferative diabetic retinopathy, retinal vein occlusion, and/or ocular ischemic syndrome.

METHODS

Race and ethnicity was defined as Asian, Black, Hispanic/Latino, non-Hispanic White, and other/unknown. In eyes with retinal ischemia, the outcome was NVG. In eyes with NVG, outcomes included treatment of retinal ischemia with pan-retinal photocoagulation (PRP), and surgery to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) with trabeculectomy, tube shunt, and cyclophotocoagulation (CPC). Covariates included age, sex, region of residence, insurance type, smoking status, and systemic and ocular comorbidities. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine adjusted associations between race and ethnicity and NVG and each type of NVG treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence of NVG, PRP, trabeculectomy, tube shunt, CPC, and any IOP-lowering surgery.

RESULTS

Of 312 106 eyes with retinal ischemia, there were 5885 (1.9%) with NVG. Compared to eyes of individuals who identified as non-Hispanic White, eyes of individuals who were Black and Hispanic/Latino had higher hazards of NVG in adjusted analyses (hazards ratio [HR] = 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.15-1.43 [for Black]; HR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.17-1.47 [for Hispanic/Latino]). Compared with eyes of individuals who were non-Hispanic White, there was higher hazards of trabeculectomy in eyes of individuals who were Hispanic/Latino (adjusted HR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.08-3.39) and higher hazards of tube shunt (adjusted HR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.07-1.69) and of any IOP-lowering surgery (adjusted HR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.09-1.53) in eyes of individuals who were Black. There were no statistically significant differences in the hazards of PRP or CPC.

CONCLUSIONS

Eyes of Black and Hispanic/Latino individuals with retinal ischemia in the IRIS Registry had higher likelihood of NVG and of IOP-lowering surgery for NVG. Further study is needed to examine the medical and social factors that preclude optimal management of diabetic eye disease, in order to prevent its blinding complications.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Address: Department of Ophthalmology, Stein and Doheny Eye Institutes, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.; Department of Ophthalmology, Stein and Doheny Eye Institutes, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Department of Biostatistics, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.; Department of Ophthalmology, Stein and Doheny Eye Institutes, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address: [email protected].

Link outs

Free resources

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.