Effect of hydrocortisone-fludrocortisone combination on mortality in septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wan-Hsuan Hsu, Mei-Yuan Liu, Min-Hsiang Chuang, Po-Yu Huang, Ting-Hui Liu, Ya-Wen Tsai, Chih-Cheng Lai, Kuo-Chuan Hung, Jheng-Yen Wu, Mita Restinia

Journal: Infection 2025;53(2):553-560

PMID: 39192056

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the effect of hydrocortisone-fludrocortisone combination therapy on the mortality of patients with septic shock.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and other databases for articles published until October 1, 2023. Only clinical studies that assessed the clinical efficacy and safety of hydrocortisone-fludrocortisone therapy for the treatment of septic shock were included. The primary outcome was the in-hospital mortality rate.

RESULTS

Seven studies with a total of 90, 756 patients were included. The study group exhibited lower in-hospital mortality rates (40.8% vs. 42.8%; OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.80-0.92). Compared to the control group, the study group also had lower intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63-0.95), 28-day mortality (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.72-1.00), 90-day mortality (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.71-1.01), 180-day mortality (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68-0.90), and one-year mortality (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.42-1.16). Subgroup analyses showed a similar trend, particularly prominent in the pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials, multicenter studies, and ICU patients, the study drug regimen involved hydrocortisone at a dose of 50 mg every 6 h in combination with fludrocortisone at 50 µg daily, with the control group receiving either placebo or standard care. Hydrocortisone-fludrocortisone also increased vasopressor-free days and reduced vasopressor duration, without elevating the risk of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

This study emphasizes the potential survival benefits of hydrocortisone-fludrocortisone combination therapy for patients with septic shock and its additional advantages, including reduced vasopressor use.

© 2024. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Address: Department of Nutrition, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.; Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.; Department of Nutrition, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.; Department of Nutrition and Health Sciences, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan, Taiwan.; Department of Food Nutrition, Chung Hwa University of Medical Technology, Tainan, Taiwan.; Department of Health and Nutrition, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy & Science, Tainan, Taiwan.; Department of Psychiatry, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.; Department of Internal Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.; Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.; Department of Clinical and Community Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University, Jakarta, Indonesia.; Center of Integrative Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.; Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.; Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. [email protected].; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan. [email protected].

Link outs

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.