Immunohistochemistry and real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction: importance in the diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis in a Peruvian population.

Fernando Arevalo, Soledad Rayme, Rocío Ramírez, Romy Rolando, Jaime Fustamante, Mario Monteghirfo, Rocio Chavez, Eduardo Monge

Journal: BMC gastroenterology 2024;24(1):166

PMID: 38755577

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis is challenging even nowadays. This study aims to report the positivity rates of new diagnostic methods such as immunohistochemistry and Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction in patients with intestinal tuberculosis, as well as describe the pathological and endoscopic features of intestinal tuberculosis in our population.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study conducted in patients diagnosed with intestinal tuberculosis, between 2010 to 2023 from the Hospital Nacional Daniel Alcides Carrion and a Private Pathology Center, both located in Peru. Clinical data was obtained, histologic features were independently re-evaluated by three pathologists; and immunohistochemistry and real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction evaluation were performed. The 33 patients with intestinal tuberculosis who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were recruited.

RESULTS

Immunohistochemistry was positive in 90.9% of cases, while real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction was positive in 38.7%. The ileocecal region was the most affected area (33.3%), and the most frequent endoscopic appearance was an ulcer (63.6%). Most of the granulomas were composed solely of epithelioid histiocytes (75.8%). Crypt architectural disarray was the second most frequent histologic finding (78.8%) after granulomas, but most of them were mild.

CONCLUSION

Since immunohistochemistry does not require an intact cell wall, it demonstrates higher sensitivity compared to Ziehl-Neelsen staining. Therefore, it could be helpful for the diagnosis of paucibacillary tuberculosis.

© 2024. The Author(s).

Address: Pathology Department, Hospital Nacional Daniel A. Carrión, Callao, Lima, Perú. [email protected].; Histodiagnóstico Gastrointestinal Private Pathology Center, Lima, Perú. [email protected].; Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Perú. [email protected].; Pathology Department, Hospital Nacional Daniel A. Carrión, Callao, Lima, Perú.; Histodiagnóstico Gastrointestinal Private Pathology Center, Lima, Perú.; Instituto de Medicina Legal y Ciencias Forenses - Perú, Lima, Perú.; Histodiagnóstico Gastrointestinal Private Pathology Center, Lima, Perú.; Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Nacional Daniel A., Carrión, Lima, Perú.; Departamento de Ciencias Dinámicas, Facultad de Medicina, Instituto de Investigacion de Bioquímica y Nutrición Alberto Guzmán Barrón, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Perú.; Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Nacional Adolfo Guevara Velasco EsSalud, Cuzco, Perú.; Universidad San Antonio Abad, Cuzco, Perú.; Instituto de Gastroenterologia del Sur, Cuzco, Perú.; Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Nacional Daniel A., Carrión, Lima, Perú.; Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Perú.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.