Real time continuous glucose monitoring in high-risk people with insulin-requiring type 2 diabetes: A randomised controlled trial.

Antony Watson, Rachael S Sampson, Oscar T Sergel-Stringer, Alisa Boucsein, Lynne Chepulis, Celeste Keesing, Jonathan A Williman, Ryan G Paul, Claire S Lever, Benjamin J Wheeler, Martin I de Bock

Journal: Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association 2024;41(8):e15348

PMID: 38758653

Abstract

AIMS

To investigate the impact of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) on glycaemia in a predominantly indigenous (Māori) population of adults with insulin-requiring type 2 diabetes (T2D) in New Zealand.

METHODS

Twelve-week, multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) of adults with T2D using ≥0.2 units/kg/day of insulin and elevated glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥64 mmol/mol (8.0%). Following a 2-week blinded CGM run-in phase, participants were randomised to rtCGM or control (self-monitoring blood glucose [SMBG]). The primary outcome was time in the target glucose range (3.9-10 mmol/L; TIR) during weeks 10-12, with data collected by blinded rtCGM in the control group.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven participants entered the RCT phase (54% Māori, 57% female), median age 53 (range 16-70 years), HbA1c 85 (IQR 74, 94) mmol/mol (9.9 [IQR 8.9, 10.8]%), body mass index (36.7 ± 7.7 kg/m). Mean (±SD) TIR increased from 37 (24)% to 53 (24)% [Δ 13%; 95% CI 4.2 to 22; P = 0.007] in the rtCGM group but did not change in the SMBG group [45 (21)% to 45 (25)%, Δ 2.5%, 95% CI -6.1 to 11, P = 0.84]. Baseline-adjusted between-group difference in TIR was 10.4% [95% CI -0.9 to 21.7; P = 0.070]. Mean HbA1c (±SD) decreased in both groups from 85 (18) mmol/mol (10.0 [1.7]%) to 64 (16) mmol/mol (8.0 [1.4]%) in the rtCGM arm and from 81 (12) mmol/mol (9.6 [1.1]%) to 65 (13) mmol/mol (8.1 [1.2]%) in the SMBG arm (P < 0.001 for both). There were no severe hypoglycaemic or ketoacidosis events in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-time CGM use in a supportive treat-to-target model of care likely improves glycaemia in a population with insulin-treated T2D and elevated HbA1c.

© 2024 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Diabetes UK.

Address: Te Huataki Waiora, School of Health, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.; Waikato Regional Diabetes Service, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.; Biostatistics and Computation Biology Unit, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.; Department of Women's and Children's Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.; Department of Paediatrics, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.; Waikato Regional Diabetes Service, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.; Waikato Regional Diabetes Service, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.; Pinnacle Midlands Health Network, New Zealand.; Te Huataki Waiora, School of Health, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.; Department of Women's and Children's Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.; Department of Paediatrics, Te Whatu Ora Southern, Dunedin, New Zealand.; Department of Paediatrics, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.; Department of Paediatrics, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.