Jae-Sik Nam, Ji-Hyun Chin, In-Cheol Choi, Sang-Wook Lee, Wook-Jong Kim, Wan-Woo Seo, Kyung-Woon Joung, Dae-Kee Choi
Journal: Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia 2024;38(9):1923-1931
PMID: 38960803
OBJECTIVES
To determine whether balanced solutions can reduce the incidence of acute kidney injury after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery compared with saline.
DESIGN
Randomized controlled trial.
SETTING
Single tertiary care center.
PARTICIPANTS
Patients who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery between June 2014 and July 2020.
INTERVENTIONS
Balanced solution-based chloride-restrictive intravenous fluid strategy.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS
The primary outcome was acute kidney injury within 7 postoperative days, as defined by the 2012 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Clinical Practice Guideline. The incidence of acute kidney injury was 4.4% (8/180) in the balanced group and 7.3% (13/178) in the saline group. The difference was not statistically significant (risk difference, -2.86%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -7.72% to 2.01%; risk ratio, 0.61, 95% CI, 0.26 to 1.43; p = 0.35). Compared with the balanced group, the saline group had higher levels of intraoperative serum chloride and lower base excess, which resulted in a lower pH.
CONCLUSIONS
In patients undergoing off-pump bypass surgery with a normal estimated glomerular filtration rate, the intraoperative balanced solution-based chloride-restrictive intravenous fluid administration strategy did not decrease the rate of postoperative acute kidney injury compared with the saline-based chloride-liberal intravenous fluid administration strategy.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.