Cardiovascular Imaging, Climate Change, and Environmental Sustainability.

Kate Hanneman, Subha V Raman, Mirvat Alasnag, Eugenio Picano, Suvai Gunasekaran, Andrew Szava-Kovats, Thomas Battey, Jonathan Gross, Emil Lee, Malenka M Bissell, Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn

Journal: Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging 2024;6(3):e240135

PMID: 38900024

Abstract

Environmental exposures including poor air quality and extreme temperatures are exacerbated by climate change and are associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Concomitantly, the delivery of health care generates substantial atmospheric greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions contributing to the climate crisis. Therefore, cardiac imaging teams must be aware not only of the adverse cardiovascular health effects of climate change, but also the downstream environmental ramifications of cardiovascular imaging. The purpose of this review is to highlight the impact of climate change on cardiovascular health, discuss the environmental impact of cardiovascular imaging, and describe opportunities to improve environmental sustainability of cardiac MRI, cardiac CT, echocardiography, cardiac nuclear imaging, and invasive cardiovascular imaging. Overarching strategies to improve environmental sustainability in cardiovascular imaging include prioritizing imaging tests with lower GHG emissions when more than one test is appropriate, reducing low-value imaging, and turning equipment off when not in use. Modality-specific opportunities include focused MRI protocols and low-field-strength applications, iodine contrast media recycling programs in cardiac CT, judicious use of US-enhancing agents in echocardiography, improved radiopharmaceutical procurement and waste management in nuclear cardiology, and use of reusable supplies in interventional suites. Finally, future directions and research are highlighted, including life cycle assessments over the lifespan of cardiac imaging equipment and the impact of artificial intelligence tools. Heart, Safety, Sustainability, Cardiovascular Imaging © RSNA, 2024.

Address: From the Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, Calif (S.G.); Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (S.G.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peter Lougheed Hospital, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology & Medical Imaging, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va (T.B.); Department of Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor School of Medicine, Houston, Tex (J.G.); Division of Cardiology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia (E.P.); OhioHealth, Columbus, Ohio (S.V.R.); Langley Memorial Hospital, British Columbia, Canada (E.L.); Department of Biomedical Imaging Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom (M.M.B.); Cardiac Center, King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia (M.A.); Cardiovascular Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (A.E.C.W.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre and Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Medical Imaging Toronto, University Health Network (UHN), 585 University Avenue, 1 PMB-298, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2 (K.H.); and Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (K.H.).
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.