Trunk postural control during unstable sitting among individuals with and without low back pain: A systematic review with an individual participant data meta-analysis.

Albert H Vette, Sheri P Silfies, Norman Peter Reeves, Michael L Madigan, Jacek Cholewicki, Jaap H van Dieen, Christian Larivière, Brad W R Roberts, Brad D Hendershot, Wolbert van den Hoorn, Francisco J Vera-Garcia, Mansour Abdullah Alshehri, Hosam Alzahrani, Stephen H M Brown, Paul W Hodges, Maury A Nussbaum, David M Klyne, David Barbado

Journal: PloS one 2024;19(1):e0296968

PMID: 38265999

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Sitting on an unstable surface is a common paradigm to investigate trunk postural control among individuals with low back pain (LBP), by minimizing the influence lower extremities on balance control. Outcomes of many small studies are inconsistent (e.g., some find differences between groups while others do not), potentially due to confounding factors such as age, sex, body mass index [BMI], or clinical presentations. We conducted a systematic review with an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis to investigate whether trunk postural control differs between those with and without LBP, and whether the difference between groups is impacted by vision and potential confounding factors.

METHODS

We completed this review according to PRISMA-IPD guidelines. The literature was screened (up to 7th September 2023) from five electronic databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection. Outcome measures were extracted that describe unstable seat movements, specifically centre of pressure or seat angle. Our main analyses included: 1) a two-stage IPD meta-analysis to assess the difference between groups and their interaction with age, sex, BMI, and vision on trunk postural control; 2) and a two-stage IPD meta-regression to determine the effects of LBP clinical features (pain intensity, disability, pain catastrophizing, and fear-avoidance beliefs) on trunk postural control.

RESULTS

Forty studies (1,821 participants) were included for the descriptive analysis and 24 studies (1,050 participants) were included for the IPD analysis. IPD meta-analyses revealed three main findings: (a) trunk postural control was worse (higher root mean square displacement [RMSdispl], range, and long-term diffusion; lower mean power frequency) among individuals with than without LBP; (b) trunk postural control deteriorated more (higher RMSdispl, short- and long-term diffusion) among individuals with than without LBP when vision was removed; and (c) older age and higher BMI had greater adverse impacts on trunk postural control (higher short-term diffusion; longer time and distance coordinates of the critical point) among individuals with than without LBP. IPD meta-regressions indicated no associations between the limited LBP clinical features that could be considered and trunk postural control.

CONCLUSION

Trunk postural control appears to be inferior among individuals with LBP, which was indicated by increased seat movements and some evidence of trunk stiffening. These findings are likely explained by delayed or less accurate corrective responses.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

This review has been registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42021124658).

Copyright: This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Address: NHMRC Centre of Clinical Research Excellence in Spinal Pain, Injury & Health, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.; Physiotherapy Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca, Saudi Arabia.; Department of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.; NHMRC Centre of Clinical Research Excellence in Spinal Pain, Injury & Health, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Donadeo Innovation Centre for Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.; Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Canada.; Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, Defense Health Agency, Falls Church, Virginia, United States of America.; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Donadeo Innovation Centre for Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.; Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.; Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal Rehabilitation Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.; Sport Research Centre, Department of Sport Sciences, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Alicante, Spain.; Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL Foundation), Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Alicante, Spain.; Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands.; Center for Neuromusculoskeletal Clinical Research, Michigan State University, Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.; Department of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.; Virginia Tech-Wake Forest School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America.; Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America.; Sumaq Life LLC, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.; Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America.; Department of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.