Delong Li, Haiqiang Yao, Jin-Yi Wan, Chong-Zhi Wang, Chun-Su Yuan, Anqi Zhang, Yuqi Wu
Journal: BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 2024;384():e076410
PMID: 38286487
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) can aid blood-sugar control and the reduction of body weight. This has lead to the rapid development of several GLP-1RAs, the publication of new research, and a need for the synthesis of this research. This systematic review and network meta-analysis of 76 randomised control trials aimed to assess how effective GLP-1RAs are in managing blood sugar levels, body weight, and cholesterol levels in adults with type 2 diabetes. Information was gathered from multiple databases, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation of existing research up to August 2023.
The results showed that GLP-1RAs can significantly improve blood-sugar control, reduce body weight, and positively affect lipid profiles (cholesterol and fat levels in the blood) in individuals with type 2 diabetes.
It was concluded that GLP-1RAs are effective and safe for diabetes management. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand the comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists in improving blood sugar control, weight, and cholesterol levels in adults with type 2 diabetes.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on glycaemic control, body weight, and lipid profile in adults with type 2 diabetes.
DESIGN
Systematic review and network meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Embase from database inception to 19 August 2023.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES
Eligible randomised controlled trials enrolled adults with type 2 diabetes who received GLP-1RA treatments and compared effects with placebo or any GLP-1RA drug, with a follow-up duration of at least 12 weeks. Trials with a crossover design, non-inferiority studies comparing GLP-1RA and other drug classes without a placebo group, using withdrawn drugs, and non-English studies were deemed ineligible.
RESULTS
76 eligible trials involving 15 GLP-1RA drugs and 39 246 participants were included in this network meta-analysis; all subsequent estimates refer to the comparison with placebo. All 15 GLP-1RAs effectively lowered haemoglobin A and fasting plasma glucose concentrations. Tirzepatide induced the largest reduction of haemoglobin A concentrations (mean difference -2.10% (95% confidence interval -2.47% to -1.74%), surface under the cumulative ranking curve 94.2%; high confidence of evidence), and fasting plasma glucose concentrations (-3.12 mmol/L (-3.59 to -2.66), 97.2%; high confidence), and proved the most effective GLP-1RA drug for glycaemic control. Furthermore, GLP-1RAs were shown to have strong benefits to weight management for patients with type 2 diabetes. CagriSema (semaglutide with cagrilintide) resulted in the highest weight loss (mean difference -14.03 kg (95% confidence interval -17.05 to -11.00); high confidence of evidence), followed by tirzepatide (-8.47 kg (-9.68 to -7.26); high confidence). Semaglutide was effective in lowering the concentration of low density lipoprotein (-0.16 mmol/L (-0.30 to -0.02)) and total cholesterol (-0.48 mmol/L (-0.84 to -0.11)). Moreover, this study also raises awareness of gastrointestinal adverse events induced by GLP-1RAs, and concerns about safety are especially warranted for high dose administration.
CONCLUSIONS
GLP-1RAs are efficacious in treating adults with type 2 diabetes. Compared with the placebo, tirzepatide was the most effective GLP-1RA drug for glycaemic control by reducing haemoglobin A and fasting plasma glucose concentrations. GLP-1RAs also significantly improved weight management for type 2 diabetes, with CagriSema performing the best for weight loss. The results prompt safety concerns for GLP-1RAs, especially with high dose administration, regarding gastrointestinal adverse events.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42022342845.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Full Text Sources:
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.