Efficacy of Conservative Interventions for Musculoskeletal Conditions on Pain and Disability in Active Serving Military Personnel-A Systematic Review.

Michel W Coppieters, Brianna Larsen, Courtney L Bounds, Hayley W Thomson, Kerrie Evans

Journal: Military medicine 2024;189(1-2):e66-e75

PMID: 36722165

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries and associated pain disorders are one of the leading causes for soldiers not being medically fit for deployment, impacting force capability and readiness. Musculoskeletal pain continues to be a leading cause of disability within military services and is associated with a substantial financial burden. A better understanding of the effectiveness of MSK pain management strategies is required. This review was designed to determine the efficacy of nonsurgical interventions, such as physiotherapy, exercise, pharmacology, and multidisciplinary programs, to manage MSK conditions in active serving military populations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus were searched to identify relevant randomized clinical trials. Recommended methods were used for article identification, selection, and data extraction. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the Grade of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation were used to appraise the studies. Where possible, meta-analyses were performed. The review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

Nineteen articles (1,408 participants) met the eligibility criteria. Low back pain (LBP) was the most frequently investigated condition, followed by knee pain, neck pain, and shoulder pain. Early physiotherapy, exercise and adjunct chiropractic manipulation (for LBP), and multidisciplinary pain programs (physiotherapy, occupational therapy, and psychology) (for chronic MSK pain) improved pain (standardized mean difference ranged from -0.39 to -1.34; low strength of evidence). Participation in multidisciplinary pain programs, adjunct chiropractic manipulation, and early physiotherapy improved disability (for LBP) (standardized mean difference ranged from -0.45 to -0.86; low to very low strength of evidence). No studies evaluated pain medication. Dietary supplements (glucosamine, chondroitin sulfate, and manganese ascorbate), electrotherapy, isolated lumbar muscle exercises, home cervical traction, or training in virtual reality showed no benefit. The studies had a high risk of bias, were typically underpowered, and demonstrated high clinical heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently available randomized clinical trials do not provide sufficient evidence to guide military organizations or health care professionals in making appropriate treatment decisions to manage MSK pain in active serving military personnel. Future research is essential to enable evidence-based recommendations for the effective management of MSK pain conditions in this unique population.

© The Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2023.

Address: Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane (Nathan), QLD 4111, Australia.; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane (Nathan), QLD 4111, Australia.; Amsterdam Movement Sciences-Program Musculoskeletal Health, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081 BT, The Netherlands.; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane (Nathan), QLD 4111, Australia.; Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, QLD 4125, Australia.; Griffith Sports Physiology and Performance, Griffith University, Southport QLD 4222, Australia.; Healthia Limited, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia.; School of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Southern Queensland, Ipswich, QLD 4305, Australia.; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.; Griffith Sports Physiology and Performance, Griffith University, Southport QLD 4222, Australia.; Healthia Limited, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.