Fenoterol delivery by Respimat soft mist inhaler versus CFC metered dose inhaler: cumulative dose-response study in asthma patients.

Walter Vincken, Helen Dewberry, Diane Moonen

Journal: The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma 2003;40(6):721-30

PMID: 14580004

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Respimat (RMT) soft mist inhaler (SMI) is a novel, propellant-free alternative to chlorofluorocarbon metered-dose inhalers (CFC-MDIs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and establish the equipotent dose of fenoterol delivered by RMT SMI vs. a conventional MDI.

DESIGN

Double-blind, randomized, crossover, comparative study between fenoterol inhaled via RMT (either 50 microg/actuation, RMT50; or 100 microg/actuation. RMT100) and MDI (100 microg/actuation; MDI100).

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

A total of 41 asthma patients received cumulative doses of fenoterol 600 microg (RMT50) or 1200 microg (RMT100 and MDI100) on 3 test days.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

The bronchodilator response (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1]) was considered therapeutically equivalent (i.e., noninferior) if the 95% confidence intervals for the difference in their mean changes from baseline were within limits of +/- 0.15L. Systemic exposure was evaluated from plasma fenoterol levels. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. RMT50 and RMT100 produced noninferior bronchodilatation to MDI100 from 30minutes after the first dose. RMT50 showed equivalent safety and tolerability to MDI100, whereas RMT100 produced a higher incidence of AEs, a significantly greater plasma potassium reduction and a significant increase in pulse rate. Fenoterol plasma levels were twice as high with RMT100 as with RMT50 or MDI100. CONCLUSIONS; The nominal dose of fenoterol administered via RMT SMI can be at least halved to achieve equivalent efficacy, safety, and tolerability to a MDI.

Address: Respiratory Division, Academic Hospital, University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium. [email protected]

Link outs

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.