The Effect of Practitioner Empathy on Patient Satisfaction : A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials.

Jeremy Howick, Jennifer Bostock, Clare L Gillies, Wen Wang, Claire D Madigan, Leila Keshtkar, Andy Ward, Sarah Ahmed, Vinay Tanna, Ismail Rahman, Keith Nockels

Journal: Annals of internal medicine 2024;177(2):196-209

PMID: 38285985

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Practitioners who deliver enhanced empathy may improve patient satisfaction with care. Patient satisfaction is associated with positive patient outcomes ranging from medication adherence to survival.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of health care practitioner empathy on patient satisfaction, using a systematic review of randomized trials.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus to 23 October 2023.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized trials published in any language that evaluated the effect of empathy on improving patient satisfaction as measured on a validated patient satisfaction scale.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data extraction, risk-of-bias assessments, and strength-of-evidence assessments were done by 2 independent reviewers. Disagreements were resolved through consensus.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Fourteen eligible randomized trials (80 practitioners; 1986 patients) were included in the analysis. Five studies had high risk of bias, and 9 had some concerns about bias. The trials were heterogeneous in terms of geographic locations (North America, Europe, Asia, and Africa), settings (hospital and primary care), practitioner types (family and hospital physicians, anesthesiologists, nurses, psychologists, and caregivers), and type of randomization (individual patient or clustered by practitioner). Although all trials suggested a positive change in patient satisfaction, inadequate reporting hindered the ability to draw definitive conclusions about the overall effect size.

LIMITATIONS

Heterogeneity in the way that empathy was delivered and patient satisfaction was measured and incomplete reporting leading to concerns about the certainty of the underpinning evidence.

CONCLUSION

Various empathy interventions have been studied to improve patient satisfaction. Development, testing, and reporting of high-quality studies within well-defined contexts is needed to optimize empathy interventions that increase patient satisfaction.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Stoneygate Trust. (PROSPERO: CRD42023412981).

Address: Stoneygate Centre for Empathic Healthcare, Leicester Medical School, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom (L.K., A.W., I.R., J.H.).; Centre for Lifestyle Medicine and Behaviour (CLiMB), The School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom (C.D.M.).; Leicester, United Kingdom (S.A.).; Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom (V.T.).; London School of Economics, London, United Kingdom (J.B.).; Library and Learning Services, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom (K.N.).; School of Business, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom (W.W.).; Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom (C.L.G.).
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.