Mauro Farella, Li Mei, Andrew R Gray, Carrol Jin, Paul A Brunton
Journal: Journal of dentistry 2024;143():104902
PMID: 38432352
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the effect of tooth whitening on biomechanical properties of vacuum-formed retainers (VFRs).
METHODS
Using a split-mouth, randomised controlled trial design, thirty participants were randomly allocated to receive whitening on either the upper or the lower arch, using 10 % carbamide peroxide for two weeks. Biomechanical properties such as hardness, tensile strength, and surface roughness were assessed two weeks after whitening was completed.
RESULTS
Tensile strength of the whitening arch (mean ± SD: 40.93 ± 3.96 MPa) was significantly lower than that of the control (47.40 ± 5.03 MPa) (difference 6.47 MPa, 95 % CI 4.51 - 8.42, p < 0.001). Hardness and internal roughness of the whitening arch (VHN = 14.63 ± 2.29 N/mm and Ra = 1.33 ± 0.35 µm, respectively) were significantly greater than those of the control (12.22 ± 1.86 N/mm and 0.96 ± 0.29 µm, respectively) (differences 2.41 N/mm, 95 % CI 1.56 - 3.25, p < 0.001 and 0.37 µm, 95 % CI 0.23 - 0.51, p < 0.001, respectively). The whitening arch showed greater tooth colour change (ΔE = 6.00 ± 3.32) than the control (ΔE = 2.50 ± 1.70) (difference = 3.50, 95 % CI 2.43 - 4.56, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Based on this short-term study, marked tooth colour change was achieved by whitening with VFRs as the whitening trays, but this changed the VFRs' biomechanical properties, including a decrease in tensile strength and an increase in hardness and internal roughness.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
The application of carbamide peroxide in VFRs may compromise their mechanical properties.
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Full Text Sources:
Full Text Sources:
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.