Approaches and reporting of alcohol and other drug testing for injured patients in hospital-based studies: A systematic review.

Biswadev Mitra, Ben Beck, Paul M Dietze, Belinda J Gabbe, Nayoung Kim, Georgina Lau, Jia Y Ang, Sandra Reeder

Journal: Drug and alcohol review 2024;43(4):897-926

PMID: 38316529

Abstract

ISSUE

Hospital alcohol and/or other drug (AOD) testing is important for identifying AOD-related injuries; however, testing methods vary. This systematic review aimed to examine biological AOD testing methods from hospital-based studies of injured patients and quantify what proportion reported key information on those testing methods.

APPROACH

Observational studies published in English from 2010 onwards involving biological AOD testing for injured patients presenting to hospital were included. Studies examining single injury causes were excluded. Extracted data included concentration thresholds for AOD detection (e.g., lower limits of detection, author-defined cut-offs), test type (e.g., immunoassay, breathalyser) and approach (e.g., routine, clinical discretion), timing of testing, sample type and the proportion of injured cases tested for AODs.

KEY FINDINGS

Of 83 included studies, 76 measured alcohol and 37 other drugs. Forty-nine studies defined blood alcohol concentration thresholds (ranging from 0 to 0.1 g/100 mL). Seven studies defined concentration thresholds for other drugs. Testing approach was reported in 39/76 alcohol and 18/37 other drug studies. Sample type was commonly reported (alcohol: n = 69/76; other drugs: n = 28/37); alcohol was typically measured using blood (n = 60) and other drugs using urine (n = 20). Studies that reported the proportion of cases tested (alcohol: n = 53/76; other drugs: n = 28/37), reported that between 0% and 89% of cases were not tested for alcohol and 0% and 91% for other drugs. Timing of testing was often unreported (alcohol: n = 61; other drugs: n = 30).

IMPLICATIONS AND CONCLUSION

Variation in AOD testing methods alongside incomplete reporting of those methods limits data comparability and interpretation. Standardised reporting of testing methods will assist AOD-related injury surveillance and prevention.

© 2024 The Authors. Drug and Alcohol Review published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and other Drugs.

Address: School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.; Health Data Research UK, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.; Emergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.; Disease Elimination Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.; National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.; Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Link outs

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.