Comparing code-free and bespoke deep learning approaches in ophthalmology.

Fares Antaki, Carolyn Yu Tung Wong, Ciara O'Byrne, Priyal Taribagil, Timing Liu, Pearse Andrew Keane

Journal: Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie 2024;262(9):2785-2798

PMID: 38446200

Abstract

AIM

Code-free deep learning (CFDL) allows clinicians without coding expertise to build high-quality artificial intelligence (AI) models without writing code. In this review, we comprehensively review the advantages that CFDL offers over bespoke expert-designed deep learning (DL). As exemplars, we use the following tasks: (1) diabetic retinopathy screening, (2) retinal multi-disease classification, (3) surgical video classification, (4) oculomics and (5) resource management.

METHODS

We performed a search for studies reporting CFDL applications in ophthalmology in MEDLINE (through PubMed) from inception to June 25, 2023, using the keywords 'autoML' AND 'ophthalmology'. After identifying 5 CFDL studies looking at our target tasks, we performed a subsequent search to find corresponding bespoke DL studies focused on the same tasks. Only English-written articles with full text available were included. Reviews, editorials, protocols and case reports or case series were excluded. We identified ten relevant studies for this review.

RESULTS

Overall, studies were optimistic towards CFDL's advantages over bespoke DL in the five ophthalmological tasks. However, much of such discussions were identified to be mono-dimensional and had wide applicability gaps. High-quality assessment of better CFDL applicability over bespoke DL warrants a context-specific, weighted assessment of clinician intent, patient acceptance and cost-effectiveness. We conclude that CFDL and bespoke DL are unique in their own assets and are irreplaceable with each other. Their benefits are differentially valued on a case-to-case basis. Future studies are warranted to perform a multidimensional analysis of both techniques and to improve limitations of suboptimal dataset quality, poor applicability implications and non-regulated study designs.

CONCLUSION

For clinicians without DL expertise and easy access to AI experts, CFDL allows the prototyping of novel clinical AI systems. CFDL models concert with bespoke models, depending on the task at hand. A multidimensional, weighted evaluation of the factors involved in the implementation of those models for a designated task is warranted.

© 2024. The Author(s).

Address: Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, 11-43 Bath St, London, EC1V 9EL, UK.; Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.; Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.; Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, 11-43 Bath St, London, EC1V 9EL, UK.; Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.; Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, 11-43 Bath St, London, EC1V 9EL, UK.; Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.; The CHUM School of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare, Montreal, QC, Canada.; Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, 11-43 Bath St, London, EC1V 9EL, UK. [email protected].; Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. [email protected].; NIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK. [email protected].

Link outs

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.