Investigating the in vitro antibacterial efficacy of composite bone cement incorporating natural product-based monomers and gentamicin.

Rui Guo, Yang Xu, Yu-Chen Kan, Lu-Yang Han, Wen-Han Bu, Long-Xu Han, Jian-Jun Chu

Journal: Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research 2024;19(1):169

PMID: 38448971

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of four natural product extracts, namely, aloe-emodin, quercetin, curcumin, and tannic acid, on the in vitro bacteriostatic properties and biocompatibility of gentamicin-loaded bone cement and to establish an experimental groundwork supporting the clinical utility of antibiotic-loaded bone cements (ALBC).

METHODS

Based on the components, the bone cement samples were categorized as follows: the gentamicin combined with aloe-emodin group, the gentamicin combined with quercetin group, the gentamicin combined with curcumin group, the gentamicin combined with tannic acid group, the gentamicin group, the aloe-emodin group, the quercetin group, the curcumin group, and the tannic acid group. Using the disk diffusion test, we investigated the antibacterial properties of the bone cement material against Staphylococcus aureus (n = 4). We tested cell toxicity and proliferation using the cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) and examined the biocompatibility of bone cement materials.

RESULTS

The combination of gentamicin with the four natural product extracts resulted in significantly larger diameters of inhibition zones compared to gentamicin alone, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Except for the groups containing tannic acid, cells in all other groups showed good proliferation across varying time intervals without displaying significant cytotoxicity (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In this study, aloe-emodin, quercetin, curcumin, and tannic acid were capable of enhancing the in vitro antibacterial performance of gentamicin-loaded bone cement against S. aureus. While the groups containing tannic acid displayed moderate cytotoxicity in in vitro cell culture, all other groups showed no discernible cytotoxic effects.

© 2024. The Author(s).

Address: Department of Orthopedics, The Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei Hospital, Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, No. 246 of Heping Road, Yaohai District, Hefei, Anhui, 230011, China.; The Fifth Clinical Medical School of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, 230032, China.; School of Food and Biological Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Anhui, 230009, China.; Department of Orthopedics, The Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei Hospital, Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, No. 246 of Heping Road, Yaohai District, Hefei, Anhui, 230011, China.; Department of Orthopedics, The Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei Hospital, Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, No. 246 of Heping Road, Yaohai District, Hefei, Anhui, 230011, China. [email protected].; The Fifth Clinical Medical School of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, 230032, China. [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.