Sajal K Chattopadhyay, Jeffrey A Reynolds, Alison E Cuellar, Gregory W Heath, David R Brown, Ross C Brownson, David Berrigan, John M Clymer, David P Hopkins, Verughese Jacob, Jamie F Chriqui, Heather M Devlin, Carlos J Crespo, Austin Barrett
Journal: American journal of preventive medicine 2024;66(6):1089-1099
PMID: 38331114
INTRODUCTION
This systematic economic review examined the cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness of park, trail, and greenway infrastructure interventions to increase physical activity or infrastructure use.
METHODS
The search period covered the date of inception of publications databases through February 2022. Inclusion was limited to studies that reported cost-benefit or cost-effectiveness outcomes and were based in the U.S. and other high-income countries. Analyses were conducted from March 2022 through December 2022. All monetary values reported are in 2021 U.S. dollars.
RESULTS
The search yielded 1 study based in the U.S. and 7 based in other high-income countries, with 1 reporting cost-effectiveness and 7 reporting cost-benefit outcomes. The cost-effectiveness study based in the United Kingdom reported $23,254 per disability-adjusted life year averted. The median benefit-to-cost ratio was 3.1 (interquartile interval=2.9-3.9) on the basis of 7 studies.
DISCUSSION
The evidence shows that economic benefits exceed the intervention cost of park, trail, and greenway infrastructure. Given large differences in the size of infrastructure, intervention costs and economic benefits varied substantially across studies. There was insufficient number of studies to determine the cost-effectiveness of these interventions.
Published by Elsevier Inc.
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.