A comparative review of Aphexda and Mozobil for mobilization prior to stem cell collection.

Hamza Hashmi, Mary McGann, Lauren Dietz, Jessica Marini

Journal: Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners 2024;30(6):1073-1077

PMID: 38629183

Abstract

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the standard of care for eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma leading to prolonged progression free and overall survival. Successful engraftment following hematopoietic stem cell infusion requires adequate stem cell doses. Current mobilization regimens include granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) with or without plerixafor. Motixafortide is a recently approved agent that can be used in combination with G-CSF for mobilization. In the absence of any head-to-head trials comparing the two products, this article aims to outline the similarities and differences of these two agents. Though moxitafortide has a more favorable pharmacokinetic profile in comparison to plerixafor, in clinical trials, the agents demonstrated similar efficacy. In addition, the use of motixafortide in clinical practice may be limited by product cost as well as administration and monitoring requirements.

Address: Department of Pharmacy, Medical University of South Carolina Health, Charleston, SC, US.; Division of Hematology Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, US.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.