Carbon budget at the individual-tree scale: dominant Eucalyptus trees partition less carbon belowground.

Dan Binkley, John D Marshall, Ezequiel Fernandez-Tschieder

Journal: The New phytologist 2024;242(5):1932-1943

PMID: 38641865

Abstract

Large trees in plantations generally produce more wood per unit of resource use than small trees. Two processes may account for this pattern: greater photosynthetic resource use efficiency or greater partitioning of carbon to wood production. We estimated gross primary production (GPP) at the individual scale by combining transpiration with photosynthetic water-use efficiency of Eucalyptus trees. Aboveground production fluxes were estimated using allometric equations and modeled respiration; total belowground carbon fluxes (TBCF) were estimated by subtracting aboveground fluxes from GPP. Partitioning was estimated by dividing component fluxes by GPP. Dominant trees produced almost three times as much wood as suppressed trees. They used 25 ± 10% (mean ± SD) of their photosynthates for wood production, whereas suppressed trees only used 12 ± 2%. By contrast, dominant trees used 27 ± 19% of their photosynthate belowground, whereas suppressed trees used 58 ± 5%. Intermediate trees lay between these extremes. Photosynthetic water-use efficiency of dominant trees was c. 13% greater than the efficiency of suppressed trees. Suppressed trees used more than twice as much of their photosynthate belowground and less than half as much aboveground compared with dominant trees. Differences in carbon partitioning were much greater than differences in GPP or photosynthetic water-use efficiency.

© 2024 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2024 New Phytologist Foundation.

Address: National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA), Agricultural Experimental Station of Delta del Paraná, Campana, B2804, Argentina.; Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.; Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, 901 83, Sweden.; Leibniz-Zentrum für Agrarlandschaftsforschung, Müncheberg, 15374, Germany.; Department of Geological Sciences, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, 405 30, Sweden.; Department of Energy and Matter Fluxes, Czech Globe, Belidla, 603 00, Czechia.; School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.

Link outs

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.