Jun Chul Park, Hang Lak Lee, Ki-Nam Shim, Yun Jeong Lim, Gwang Ho Baik, Byung-Wook Kim, Hee Seok Moon, Jeong Seop Moon, Su Jin Hong, Gwang Ha Kim, In-Kyung Sung, Hyunsoo Chung, Hyuk Soon Choi, Jong Jae Park, Wan Sik Lee, Young Hoon Youn
Journal: Gut and liver 2024;18(2):257-264
PMID: 38384180
BACKGROUND/AIMS
: Tegoprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker that has beneficial effects on acid-related disorders such as gastroesophageal reflux and peptic ulcer diseases. This study aimed to validate the effect of tegoprazan on endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)-induced artificial ulcers.
METHODS
: Patients from 16 centers in Korea who underwent ESD for gastric neoplasia were enrolled. After ESD, pantoprazole was administered intravenously for 48 hours. The patients were randomly allocated to either the tegoprazan or esomeprazole group. Tegoprazan 50 mg or esomeprazole 40 mg were administered for 4 weeks, after which gastroscopic evaluation was performed. If the artificial ulcer had not healed, the same dose of tegoprazan or esomeprazole was administered for an additional 4 weeks, and a gastroscopic evaluation was performed.
RESULTS
: One hundred sixty patients were enrolled in this study. The healing rates of artificial ulcers at 4 weeks were 30.3% (23/76) and 22.1% (15/68) in the tegoprazan and esomeprazole groups, respectively (p=0.006). At 8 weeks after ESD, the cumulative ulcer healing rates were 73.7% (56/76) and 77.9% (53/68) in the tegoprazan and esomeprazole groups, respectively (p=0.210). Delayed bleeding occurred in two patients in the tegoprazan group (2.6%) and in one patient in the esomeprazole group (1.5%). Other adverse events were negligible in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS
: Tegoprazan showed similar effects on post-ESD artificial ulcer healing in comparison with esomeprazole.
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.