A multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial of Tongluo-Qutong rubber plaster for the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy.

Yong-Li Zhao, Zhong-Hua Wang, Hui Li, Jing Liu, Xing-Wen Xie, Chun-Xiao Wang, Yong-Sheng Luo, Ding-Peng Li

Journal: Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation 2024;37(6):1591-1599

PMID: 39093063

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In China, Tongluo-Qutong rubber plaster (TQRP) is commonly used for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, but lacks high-quality trials.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to conduct a multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial in China to investigate the practical efficacy and safety of TQRP in the treatment of CSR.

METHODS

A total of 240 patients diagnosed with CSR were recruited for the investigation from multiple hospitals in Gansu province, China. The patients were randomly assigned to either an experimental or a control group. The experimental group received treatment with TQRP, whereas the control group was administered a diclofenac sodium patch (DSP) for a maximum duration of 21 days. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain, the proportion of patients experiencing 50% or more pain relief, the neck disability index (NDI), changes as per the Eaton trial, and recurrence during the follow-up period were evaluated for both groups. The safety and adverse events associated with the concurrent drug therapy were also evaluated.

RESULTS

At each time point, the mean VAS and NDI scores of both groups demonstrated a downward trend. The experimental group exhibited a greater decline in VAS score at each time point compared to the control group (P< 0.01). In the Eaton trial, both the percentage of patients experiencing pain relief of 50% or more and the number of abnormal results exhibited improvement. However, the outcomes in the 21 ± 3d experimental group were significantly superior to those in the control group (P< 0.01). During the follow-up period, the recurrence events in the experimental group were reduced compared to the control group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P< 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was 1.74% for TQRP and 3.54% for DSP.

CONCLUSION

TQRP is effective and safe in the treatment of CSR.

Address: Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China.; Tianshui City Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianshui, China.; Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China.; Gansu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China.; Affiliated Hospital of Northwest University for Nationalities, Lanzhou, China.; Tianshui City Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianshui, China.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.