Prevalent occupational exposures and risk of lung cancer among women: Results from the application of the Canadian Job-Exposure Matrix (CANJEM) to a combined set of ten case-control studies.

John K Field, Andrea 't' Mannetje, Paul A Demers, John R McLaughlin, Marie-Elise Parent, Lesley Richardson, Vikki Ho, Karl-Heinz Jöckel, Lorenzo Richiardi, Neil Pearce, Pascal Guénel, Joachim Schüz, Ann Olsson, Jérôme Lavoué, Jack Siemiatycki, Wolfgang Ahrens, Dario Consonni, Maria T Landi, Mengting Xu, Heinz-Erich Wichmann, Lorenzo Simonato, Loredana Radoi, Beata Świątkowska

Journal: American journal of industrial medicine 2024;67(3):200-213

PMID: 38192156

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Worldwide, lung cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in women. The present study explored associations between occupational exposures that are prevalent among women, and lung cancer.

METHODS

Data from 10 case-control studies of lung cancer from Europe, Canada, and New Zealand conducted between 1988 and 2008 were combined. Lifetime occupational history and information on nonoccupational factors including smoking were available for 3040 incident lung cancer cases and 4187 controls. We linked each reported job to the Canadian Job-Exposure Matrix (CANJEM), which provided estimates of probability, intensity, and frequency of exposure to each selected agent in each job. For this analysis, we selected 15 agents (cleaning agents, biocides, cotton dust, synthetic fibers, formaldehyde, cooking fumes, organic solvents, cellulose, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from petroleum, ammonia, metallic dust, alkanes C18+, iron compounds, isopropanol, and calcium carbonate) that had lifetime exposure prevalence of at least 5% in the combined study population. For each agent, we estimated lung cancer risk in each study center for ever-exposure, by duration of exposure, and by cumulative exposure, using separate logistic regression models adjusted for smoking and other covariates. We then estimated the meta-odds ratios using random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

None of the agents assessed showed consistent and compelling associations with lung cancer among women. The following agents showed elevated odds ratio in some analyses: metallic dust, iron compounds, isopropanol, and organic solvents. Future research into occupational lung cancer risk factors among women should prioritize these agents.

© 2024 The Authors. American Journal of Industrial Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Address: University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada.; International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.; Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Centre Armand-Frappier Santé Biotechnologie, Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique, Laval, Quebec, Canada.; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.; Occupational Cancer Research Centre, Ontario Health, Toronto, Canada.; Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Team Exposome and Heredity, U1018 Inserm, Institut Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.; Institute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.; Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany.; Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.; Epidemiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.; Department of Medical Sciences, Cancer Epidemiology Unit, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.; Research Centre for Hauora and Health, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand.; The Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Lodz, Poland.; Roy Castle Lung Cancer Research Programme, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.; Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.