Israa Habeeb Naser, Neelima Kukreti, Hussain Abdulkhaliq Alsaif, Amani Ahmed A L Ibrahim, Nawal A Al Kaabil, Khalid A L Mugheed, Roy Rillera Marzo, Ramaiah Itumalla, Tahani Al Rahbeni, Prakasini Satapathy, Quazi Syed Zahiruddin, Ali A Rabaan, Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib, Sarvesh Rustagi, Maha F Al-Subaie, Hayam A Alrasheed, Arkadiusz Dziedzic, Mohammed Alissa, Shilpa Gaidhane
Journal: JMIR public health and surveillance 2024;10():e54769
PMID: 38687992
BACKGROUND
The unprecedented emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the development and global distribution of vaccines, making the understanding of global vaccine acceptance and hesitancy crucial to overcoming barriers to vaccination and achieving widespread immunization.
OBJECTIVE
This umbrella review synthesizes findings from systematic reviews and meta-analyses to provide insights into global perceptions on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy across diverse populations and regions.
METHODS
We conducted a literature search across major databases to identify systematic reviews and meta-analysis that reported COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy. The AMSTAR-2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) criteria were used to assess the methodological quality of included systematic reviews. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 17 with a random effect model. The data synthesis is presented in a table format and via a narrative.
RESULTS
Our inclusion criteria were met by 78 meta-analyses published between 2021 and 2023. Our analysis revealed a moderate vaccine acceptance rate of 63% (95% CI 0.60%-0.67%) in the general population, with significant heterogeneity (I = 97.59%). Higher acceptance rates were observed among health care workers and individuals with chronic diseases, at 64% (95% CI 0.57%-0.71%) and 69% (95% CI 0.61%-0.76%), respectively. However, lower acceptance was noted among pregnant women, at 48% (95% CI 0.42%-0.53%), and parents consenting for their children, at 61.29% (95% CI 0.56%-0.67%). The pooled vaccine hesitancy rate was 32% (95% CI 0.25%-0.39%) in the general population. The quality assessment revealed 19 high-quality, 38 moderate-quality, 15 low-quality, and 6 critically low-quality meta-analyses.
CONCLUSIONS
This review revealed the presence of vaccine hesitancy globally, emphasizing the necessity for population-specific, culturally sensitive interventions and clear, credible information dissemination to foster vaccine acceptance. The observed disparities accentuate the need for continuous research to understand evolving vaccine perceptions and to address the unique concerns and needs of diverse populations, thereby aiding in the formulation of effective and inclusive vaccination strategies.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42023468363; https://tinyurl.com/2p9kv9cr.
©Tahani Al Rahbeni, Prakasini Satapathy, Ramaiah Itumalla, Roy Rillera Marzo, Khalid A L Mugheed, Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib, Shilpa Gaidhane, Quazi Syed Zahiruddin, Ali A Rabaan, Hayam A Alrasheed, Maha F Al-Subaie, Nawal A Al Kaabil, Mohammed Alissa, Amani Ahmed A L Ibrahim, Hussain Abdulkhaliq Alsaif, Israa Habeeb Naser, Sarvesh Rustagi, Neelima Kukreti, Arkadiusz Dziedzic. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (https://publichealth.jmir.org), 30.04.2024.
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.