Dietary Adherence Is Associated with Perceived Stress, Anhedonia, and Food Insecurity Independent of Adiposity.

Douglas C Chang, Emma J Stinson, Marci E Gluck, Jonathan Krakoff, Tomás Cabeza de Baca, Susanne B Votruba, Scott G Engel, Jetaun M Booker, Andrés M Treviño-Alvarez

Journal: Nutrients 2024;16(4):

PMID: 38398850

Plain Language Summary

plain language summary logo

Adherence to a prescribed dietary intervention is a key determinant of successful weight management and overall health outcomes. Previous research has identified factors such as stress, the inability to feel pleasure (anhedonia), and food insecurity as being associated with poor dietary behaviours and weight gain, and their combined influence on dietary adherence remains unclear. This secondary analysis of a six-week clinical trial of 60 individuals with obesity and normal weight aimed to assess adherence to a prescribed diet through weekly and daily evaluations.

The results showed that higher levels of perceived stress and anhedonia were linked to body fat percentage, while food insecurity did not show a significant relationship with body fat percentage. Higher perceived stress, anhedonia, and food insecurity were associated with lower adherence scores.

It was concluded that psychological factors like stress and anhedonia can influence body composition, regardless of a person's weight and that these may play a more important role in dietary adherence. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that perceived stress, anhedonia, and food insecurity should be prioritised as targets for improving dietary adherence.

Abstract

We examined whether perceived stress, anhedonia, and food insecurity were associated with dietary adherence during a 6-week intervention. Sixty participants (23 m; 53 ± 14 y) completed psychosocial measures and were provided with full meals. Individuals with obesity were randomized to a weight-maintaining energy needs (WMENs) ( = 18; BMI 33 ± 4) or a 35% calorie-reduced diet (n = 19; BMI 38 ± 9); normal-weight individuals (n = 23; BMI 23 ± 2) were assigned to a WMENs diet. Adherence scores were determined via weekly assessments and daily ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) of real-time behavior in a natural environment. Perceived stress and anhedonia were associated with % body fat (all r-values > 0.25, all -values < 0.05), but food insecurity and adherence were not. Higher perceived stress ( = -0.31, = 0.02), anhedonia ( = -0.34, = 0.01), and food insecurity ( = -0.27, = 0.04) were associated with lower adherence scores, even after adjusting for age, sex, and % body fat. In all adjusted models, % body fat was not associated with adherence. Higher measures of stress, anhedonia, and food insecurity predicted lower adherence independently of body fat, indicating that psychosocial factors are important targets for successful adherence to dietary interventions, regardless of body size.

Address: Obesity and Diabetes Clinical Research Section, Phoenix Epidemiology and Clinical Research Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Phoenix, AZ 85016, USA.; Sanford Research, Fargo, ND 58103, USA.

Patient Centred Factor

Clinical Imbalances

Modifiable Lifestyle Factors

Nutrition Evidence Keywords

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.