MMF Is an Effective and Safer Treatment Options for Treatment-Naïve Patients With Autoimmune Hepatitis Compared to Azathioprine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Fariha Hasan, Muhammad Shahzil, Edzel Lorraine Co, Taha Bin Arif, Muhammad Tayyab Anwar, Muhammad Ali Khaqan, Rameez Tarar, Hamza Naeem, Sibgha Farooq, Ali Jaan, Ammad Javaid Chaudhary, Vinay Jahagirdar, Reena Salgia

Journal: Journal of digestive diseases 2025;26(3-4):113-128

PMID: 40386905

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Autoimmune Hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic inflammatory liver disease with significant morbidity and mortality if untreated. Current first-line treatment involves corticosteroids and azathioprine (AZA), which are effective but are associated with significant adverse effects and treatment intolerance. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), an immunosuppressive agent with a potentially better safety profile, has emerged as an alternative. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of MMF compared to AZA in treatment-naïve AIH patients.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Databases were searched for articles published up to May 2024. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan, employing a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Five studies involving 621 patients were included. MMF showed significantly higher rates of complete biochemical response compared to AZA (odds ratio [OR] 3.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.07-6.40, p < 0.00001) and lower non-response rates (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.24-0.85, p = 0.01). Corticosteroid withdrawal rates were also higher in the MMF group (OR 2.89, 95% CI 1.69-4.94, p = 0.0001). Relapse rate and cumulative prednisolone dose were comparable between the two groups. MMF demonstrated a better safety profile, with significantly lower rates of gastrointestinal symptoms (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.27-0.79, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

MMF shows superior efficacy and tolerability compared to AZA in treatment-naïve AIH patients and may serve as a preferred first-line therapy, offering improved patient adherence and clinical outcomes. Further randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

© 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Digestive Diseases published by Chinese Medical Association Shanghai Branch, Chinese Society of Gastroenterology, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Address: Department of Internal Medicine, John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, Illinois, USA.; Department of Internal Medicine, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.; Department of Internal Medicine, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Santo Tomas Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Sampaloc, Manila, Philippines.; Department of Internal Medicine, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, New Jersey, USA.; Department of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.; Department of Medicine, Avicenna Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan.; Department of Internal Medicine, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York, USA.; Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA.; Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.