How physical activity context relates to cognition across the lifespan: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Valentin Benzing, Levi Wade, Caterina Pesce, Katherine B Owen, Myrto F Mavilidi, George Thomas, David R Lubans, Katie Robinson, Celia Álvarez-Bueno, Spyridoula Vazou, Anthony D Okely, Andrew J Woods, Sofia Anzeneder, Jade Burley

Journal: Psychological bulletin 2025;151(5):544-579

PMID: 40489179

Abstract

Although numerous reviews and meta-analyses have examined the effects of physical activity on cognition, no previous meta-analysis has comprehensively explored the role of contextual factors. In this systematic review, we examined the role of contextual moderators along with more commonly investigated individual (e.g., age) and physical activity-related moderators (e.g., intensity, type). A multilevel meta-analysis was applied to 171 chronic (654 effect sizes) and 68 acute studies (305 effect sizes) involving 48,625 participants from preschool to older adulthood. On average, small positive effects on cognition were found for participation in both chronic (g = 0.25, 95% CI [0.19, 0.31]) and acute physical activity (g = 0.21, 95% CI [0.12, 0.30]). Physical activity effects on cognition seem to be jointly moderated by contextual and physical activity-related factors. The largest effect sizes were depicted for chronic practice of outdoor physical activity of moderate-to-vigorous intensity (g = 0.63, 95% CI [0.41; 0.85]) and with high cognitive demand (g = 0.53, 95% CI [0.15, 0.91]), and for acute bouts of outdoor physical activity of moderate intensity (g = 0.71, 95% CI [0.42, 0.99]). These results may inform the design of future chronic and acute physical activity trials to foster a more comprehensive understanding of the intersection between multiple moderators. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

Address: School of Education, Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Wollongong.; Department of Kinesiology, Michigan State University.; Centre for Active Living and Learning, College of Human and Social Futures, University of Newcastle.; School of Health and Society, Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Wollongong.; Institute of Sport Sciences, University of Bern.; Prevention Research Collaboration Sydney, School of Public Health, University of Sydney.; Faculty of Nursing, University of Castilla-La Mancha.; Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for the Digital Child.; Health and Wellbeing Centre for Research Innovation, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland.; Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome Foro Italico.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.