Modifying lumbar flexion pain thresholds in patients with chronic low back pain through visual-proprioceptive manipulation with virtual reality: a cross-sectional study.

Julio Doménech, Juan J Amer-Cuenca, Juan F Lisón, Marta Miragall, Rocío Herrero, Rosa M Baños, Jaime Jordán-López, María D Arguisuelas, M Lourdes Peñalver-Barrios

Journal: Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation 2025;22(1):138

PMID: 40537791

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND

Movement-evoked pain may serve as a protective response influenced by visual-proprioceptive cues signaling potentially threatening movements. This study aimed to assess the impact of manipulating visual-proprioceptive feedback using virtual reality (VR) during lumbar flexion on movement-evoked pain thresholds. Additionally, we explored whether individuals with elevated pain, kinesiophobia, and catastrophizing were more susceptible to visual-proprioceptive manipulation.

METHODS

Fifty participants with non-specific chronic low back pain (cLBP) were included. We assessed lumbar flexion-evoked pain thresholds alongside pain levels, pain interference, kinesiophobia, and catastrophizing. Participants performed lumbar flexion movements in three conditions: (1) without VR (control, F), (2) with a virtual illusion shortening the perceived arm length by 20% (understated condition, F-), and (3) with a virtual illusion elongating arm length by 20% (overstated condition, F +). Range of motion (ROM) was measured using an electro-goniometer. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc tests examined differences among conditions, and three two-sample t-tests explored whether individuals with higher pain, kinesiophobia, and catastrophizing were more affected by visual-proprioceptive manipulation.

RESULTS

Understating the flexion task (F-) led to a 5% increase in movement compared to the control (P = 0.04; 95% CI [0.6%, 10.7%]) and a 7% increase compared to the overstated condition (F +) (P < 0.001; 95% CI [2.6%, 11.6%]). Additionally, individuals with higher pain levels and pain interference, exhibited a more pronounced response to the understated condition (F-).

CONCLUSIONS

Manipulating visual-proprioceptive feedback through VR significantly influenced pain thresholds during lumbar flexion in cLBP patients. The understated condition (F-) extended pain-free movement, delaying pain onset. Furthermore, pain intensity and interference modulated susceptibility to visual feedback manipulation. These findings enhance our understanding of how visual-proprioceptive feedback influences pain perception and movement patterns in cLBP. They suggest new avenues for pain assessment, therapeutic interventions, and clinical strategies, particularly for individuals with high pain levels, interference, kinesiophobia, and catastrophizing. TRIAL REGISTRATION  : This study was retrospectively registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov with identifier NCT06750887.

© 2025. The Author(s).

Address: Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Alfara del Patriarca, Valencia, Spain.; Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Alfara del Patriarca, Valencia, Spain.; Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain.; CIBER of Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition (CIBEROBN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.; Department of Personality, Evaluation, and Psychological Treatments, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.; CIBER of Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition (CIBEROBN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.; Department of Psychology and Sociology, Universidad de Zaragoza, Teruel, Spain.; CIBER of Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition (CIBEROBN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.; Department of Personality, Evaluation, and Psychological Treatments, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.; Polibienestar Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.; Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Alfara del Patriarca, Valencia, Spain. [email protected].; Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Alfara del Patriarca, Valencia, Spain.; CIBER of Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition (CIBEROBN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.