Probiotics and gastrointestinal disorders: an umbrella meta-analysis of therapeutic efficacy.

Parmida Jamilian, Qingfang Zeng, Sanaz Asemani, Haixia Yu, Yonggang Zhang, Pingdong Li, Huaiyang Wu, Yunying Zhuang, Mehrdad Jamali

Journal: European journal of medical research 2025;30(1):515

PMID: 40551240

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Probiotic interventions are increasingly considered for alleviating gastrointestinal disorders such as diarrhea, nausea, bloating, and epigastric discomfort. This umbrella meta-analysis aims to resolve inconsistencies in existing research and offers a comprehensive assessment of probiotics' impact on these gastrointestinal symptoms.

METHODS

We conducted an extensive literature search across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (up to June 2024), including meta-analyses of interventional studies investigating probiotics' effects on gastrointestinal disorders. Pooled effect sizes with 95% confidence intervals were derived using a random-effects model, accompanied by subgroup and sensitivity analyses. The certainty of evidence and study quality were evaluated using AMSTAR 2 tools.

RESULTS

Probiotic supplementation was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of diarrhea (RR 0.44; 95% CI 0.37-0.52), nausea (RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.49-0.60), epigastric pain (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.56-0.87), bloating (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.64-0.84), and taste disturbance (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.36-0.75), all with p-values < 0.001. Subgroup analyses revealed more pronounced effects in studies with shorter intervention durations (≤ 2-4 weeks), and multi-strain formulations, particularly for diarrhea and epigastric pain. However, moderate to high heterogeneity and generally low methodological quality among several included meta-analyses limit the robustness of the findings.

CONCLUSION

This umbrella meta-analysis demonstrates the potential effectiveness of probiotics in alleviating gastrointestinal symptoms. However, the findings should be interpreted with caution due to moderate to high heterogeneity and the generally low methodological quality of many included studies.

© 2025. The Author(s).

Address: Department of Gastroenterology, The 910 Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistic Support Force, Quanzhou, China.; Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.; Department of Gastroenterology, The 910 Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistic Support Force, Quanzhou, China.; Department of Health Iatrics, The 910 Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistic Support Force, Hua-Yuan Road No.180, Quanzhou, Fujian, China.; School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Faculty of Nutrition and Food Science, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Attar-Neishaburi St., Golgasht Alley, Azadi Blvd., Tabriz, Iran.; Student Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.; School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.; School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Faculty of Nutrition and Food Science, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Attar-Neishaburi St., Golgasht Alley, Azadi Blvd., Tabriz, Iran. [email protected].; Student Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. [email protected].; Department of Health Iatrics, The 910 Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistic Support Force, Hua-Yuan Road No.180, Quanzhou, Fujian, China. [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.