Sulfonamide Allergy and Alternative Treatments in Ocular Toxoplasmosis.

Francisco Calleja Casado, Antonio Duch Samper

Journal: Romanian journal of ophthalmology 2025;69(2):147-157

PMID: 40698108

Abstract

PURPOSE

To summarize current knowledge on the clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of ocular toxoplasmosis, with emphasis on alternatives for sulfonamide-allergic patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive PubMed search (1908-2021) was conducted using terms like , ocular toxoplasmosis, posterior uveitis, and retinochoroiditis. Priority was given to studies published after 2000, particularly those from 2010 onwards. Google Scholar, as well as English and Spanish sources, were also utilized.

RESULTS

Ocular toxoplasmosis is the most common infectious form of posterior uveitis worldwide, typically presenting as necrotizing retinochoroiditis with associated vitreomacular adhesion and vitritis. Diagnosis is mainly clinical, supported by serology (IgG/IgM) and PCR of intraocular fluids when needed. Standard treatment includes systemic antiparasitic agents (e.g., pyrimethamine with sulfadiazine or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) plus corticosteroids. In patients with sulfonamide allergies, alternatives such as pyrimethamine with clindamycin or azithromycin, or intravitreal clindamycin with dexamethasone, are effective. Recent studies show comparable outcomes with these regimens. Prompt treatment of active disease helps reduce retinal damage.

DISCUSSION

Recent evidence supports the efficacy and safety of non-sulfonamide regimens and intravitreal therapies in managing ocular toxoplasmosis. These options are particularly valuable for patients with contraindications to standard treatments. Advances in imaging and molecular diagnostics have also enhanced early recognition and tailored management of the disease, contributing to improved visual outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Advances in diagnostic tools (PCR, intraocular antibody detection) and alternative therapies have improved outcomes in ocular toxoplasmosis, including in patients who are intolerant to sulfonamides. Clindamycin-based or intravitreal approaches offer effective, safe options. Further research is needed to refine treatment protocols, prevent recurrences, and clarify disease pathogenesis.

© 2025 The Authors.

Address: Ophthalmology Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.; Ophthalmology Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.; University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.