Impacts of Reducing Sitting Time or Increasing Sit-to-Stand Transitions on Blood Pressure and Glucose Regulation in Postmenopausal Women: Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.

Dori E Rosenberg, Lindsay Dillon, Simon Schenk, Andrea Z LaCroix, Loki Natarajan, Neville Owen, Dorothy D Sears, Sheri J Hartman, David W Dunstan, James F Sallis, Rong W Zablocki, Ruohui Chen, Jeffrey S Patterson

Journal: Circulation 2025;152(8):492-504

PMID: 40709462

Plain Language Summary

plain language summary logo

After menopause, women experience hormonal changes that increase their risk of high blood pressure, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes. Many postmenopausal women also spend long periods sitting each day, which may be linked to poorer heart and metabolic health. While structured exercise is beneficial, it is not always achievable for everyone. The aim of this randomised control trial of 407 women was to determine whether behavioural changes to sedentary behaviour could improve blood pressure and blood sugar regulation.

The results showed that individuals who were encouraged to stand up more often during the day had a meaningful drop in their blood pressure (both the top and bottom numbers) compared to the control group. The group that was simply told to sit less did reduce their sitting time, but it did not lead to clear improvements in blood pressure. Neither group showed meaningful improvements in blood sugar control. Overall, the two approaches had different effects, showing that both the total amount of time spent sitting and how often you get up and move can affect heart and metabolic health in different ways.

In conclusion, standing up more often throughout the day can help lower blood pressure in women after menopause. Simple changes like sitting less or getting up more frequently can support heart and metabolic health, especially blood pressure. Healthcare professionals can recommend these practical changes to women who find regular exercise challenging. This approach may help lower the risk of heart and metabolic diseases in this group of women.

Expert Review

Reviewer: Sarah Cassar
17th Apr 2026
plain language summary logo

Conflict of interest

None

Take home message

Standing up and sitting back down more often throughout the day may help lower diastolic blood pressure in overweight/obese postmenopausal women within three months.

Evidence category

A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)

Summary review

Introduction

The study aimed to evaluate the physiological impact of two intervention arms (reducing sitting time vs increasing sit-to-stand transitions [STST]) on blood pressure and glucose regulation, compared to the control group among overweight/obese sedentary postmenopausal women.

Method

This three-arm randomised controlled trial enrolled 407 participants (aged 55 to 91 years) who were randomised (1:1:1) into the sit-less (n=136), increase STST (n=136), or healthy living (n=135) arms. Participants received 7 coaching sessions (5 in person and 2 by phone). The primary outcomes were glucoregulatory (insulin, glucose, HbA1c, and HOMA2-IR) and blood pressure markers assessed at baseline and 3 months.

Results

  • The sit less group significantly reduced total daily sitting time by 58 minutes (baseline: 654 minutes/day; 3 months: 579 minutes/day) compared with the healthy living group (baseline: 669 minutes; 3 months: 652 minutes) (95% CI, –82.92 to –33.59; P<0.001).

  • The STST group significantly increased daily STST by 26/ day (baseline: 45/day; 3 months: 71/day) compared with the healthy living group (baseline: 43/day; 3 months: 43/day) (95% CI, 17.71 to 33.64; P<0.001).

  • At baseline, there were no significant differences between the three groups in blood pressure or glucose regulation outcomes.

  • At baseline, HbA1c differed significantly between the three groups (P=0.001) with mean (SD) values of 5.80 (0.76) in the healthy living group; 5.64 (0.53) in the sit-less group and 5.54 (0.36) in the STST group.

  • The STST group showed a significant reduction in diastolic blood pressure compared with the healthy living group (-2.24 mm Hg; 95% CI, -4.08 to -0.40; P=0.02). However, although systolic blood pressure decreased (–3.33 mm Hg; 95% CI, –6.32 to –0.33; P=0.03), it did not meet the prespecified statistical significance level.

  • No intervention effects on glucoregulatory biomarkers (insulin, glucose, HbA1c, and HOMA2-IR) were observed in either intervention group compared to the healthy living group (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Postmenopausal women are at high risk of prolonged sedentary behaviour and cardiovascular disease. Increasing STST reduced diastolic blood pressure within 3 months, supporting the effectiveness of interventions targeting sitting behaviours in this population.

Clinical practice applications

  • Healthcare practitioners working with overweight/obese postmenopausal women could recommend increasing STST throughout the day to support diastolic blood pressure management.

  • When supporting sedentary individuals, it is important to distinguish between total sitting time and STST frequency to better guide targeted health interventions.

Considerations for future research

  • Future studies with longer follow-up periods are needed to better observe sizeable physiological changes.

  • Study population focused on overweight/obese women and lacked racial and ethnic diversity. Thus, future research should enrol ethnically diverse participants, and clinical populations with prehypertension or prediabetes to better identify differences in glucoregulatory outcomes.

  • Continuous glucose monitoring may be used to better understand the association between sedentary behaviour and glucoregulatory outcomes.

  • Further research should also assess diet and sleep in order to evaluate their potential impact on the study outcomes.

plain language summary logo
Expert reviews are written by nutrition professionals and academics with advanced qualifications to provide a critical appraisal of the article and implications for practice. Each review is peer-reviewed by a member of the NED Editorial Board. Find out more about our NED Expert Reviewers here.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Public health and clinical guidelines identify the importance of sedentary behaviors for cardiovascular diseases, particularly among postmenopausal women. The goal of this trial was to compare the behavioral and physiological impacts of 2 distinct approaches to changing sedentary behaviors.

METHODS

Overweight or obese sedentary postmenopausal women (N=407) were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 study conditions for 3 months: (1) healthy living (control), (2) reduce sitting time (sit less), and (3) increase sit-to-stand transitions (STSTs; sit-to-stand). Each study arm received 7 individual health coach sessions across 12 weeks. At baseline and 3 months, participants had fasting blood drawn, had blood pressure measured, and wore thigh (activPAL) and hip (ActiGraph) accelerometers for 7 days. Linear mixed models evaluated each intervention arm compared with the control (healthy living) arm.

RESULTS

A total of 388 women (95%) completed the 3-month trial. The sit less arm reduced total sitting time by 58 minutes per day more than the healthy living arm (95% CI, -82.9 to -33.6; <0.001) but did not change STSTs (-1 STST/day [95% CI, -9.4 to 6.5]; =0.72). Conversely, the sit-to-stand arm significantly increased STST by 26 STST per day more than the healthy living arm (95% CI, 17.71 to 33.64; <0.001) but did not differ in change to sitting time (-10 min/day [95% CI, -34.6 to 14.9]; =0.44). The sit-to-stand arm had significant decreases in diastolic blood pressure compared with the healthy living arm (-2.24 mm Hg [95% CI, -4.08 to -0.40]; =0.02) and similar decreases in systolic blood pressure compared with the healthy living arm (-3.33 mm Hg [95% CI, -6.32 to -0.33]; =0.03), although it did not reach the a priori significance threshold of <0.025. There were no significant intervention effects on blood pressure for the sit less arm and no intervention effects for the glucoregulatory outcomes for either arm.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial demonstrated the feasibility of changing sedentary behaviors as well as the distinct nature of sitting time and STST. Increasing STST improved blood pressure in overweight and obese postmenopausal women within 3 months. Focusing on increasing STST may be an achievable behavioral target to reduce cardiovascular disease risk in postmenopausal women.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03473145.

Address: Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science (S.J.H., A.Z.L., L.N., R.W.Z., R.C., L.D., J.F.S.), University of California San Diego, La Jolla.; Moores Cancer Center (S.J.H., D.D.S., L.N.), University of California San Diego, La Jolla.; Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science (S.J.H., A.Z.L., L.N., R.W.Z., R.C., L.D., J.F.S.), University of California San Diego, La Jolla.; Moores Cancer Center (S.J.H., D.D.S., L.N.), University of California San Diego, La Jolla.; Department of Medicine (D.D.S.), University of California San Diego, La Jolla.; Department of Family Medicine (D.D.S.), University of California San Diego, La Jolla.; College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix (D.D.S., J.S.P.).; Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science (S.J.H., A.Z.L., L.N., R.W.Z., R.C., L.D., J.F.S.), University of California San Diego, La Jolla.; Feinberg School of Medicine, Biostatistics Division, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL (R.C.).; College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix (D.D.S., J.S.P.).; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine (S.S.), University of California San Diego, La Jolla.; Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia (D.W.D.).; Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia (D.W.D., N.O.).; Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia (D.W.D., N.O.).; School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia (N.O.).; Investigative Sciences Division, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle (D.E.R.).

Patient Centred Factor

Physical Environment

Laboratory Testing

Jadad Score

Allocation Concealment

Psychological/Emotional Environment

Bioactive Substances

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.