Ramy Mohamed Ghazy, Saleh M Al-Qahtani, Hoda Ali Ahmed Shiba, Hebatalla Abdelmaksoud Abdelmonsef Ahmed, Ayed A Shati, Layan Saeed Alshmrani, Razan Mubarak Alqahtani, Reema Saeed Almater, Rawan Alqahtani, Reema Mohammed Abdullah Alshehri, Yara Ahmed Salem Alshehri, Lamia Ahmed M Saddah
Journal: Medicine 2025;104(30):e43459
PMID: 40725976
Universal screening for developmental language delay (DLD) is of vital importance, as early identification and intervention can significantly reduce the risk of long-term adverse outcomes, including diminished cognitive functioning, impaired communication skills, and literacy difficulties. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors associated with DLD in children. Using a community-based approach, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among residents of the Aseer region in Saudi Arabia. The study population included children aged ≤6 years. Face-to-face interviews were carried out in community settings, including nurseries and schools, where children were screened using the Arabic-translated version of the Preschool Language Scale, Fourth Edition. A total of 410 children were included; their median (interquartile range) age was 46.0 (22.0-65.0) months, 53.2% were females, 82.7% resided in urban areas, 38.5% of the studied parents reported a consanguineous relationship, and 8.5% of families reported a history of speech or language disorders. For auditory comprehension, infants exhibited the highest mean score, while kindergarten-aged children recorded the lowest mean score (105.1 ± 23.6 vs 80.7 ± 24.0; P < .001). Regarding expressive communication, infants had the highest performance, while preschoolers aged 37 to 48 months had the lowest score (101.2 ± 22.0 vs 79.4 ± 20.8; P < .001). Infants had the highest total score, while preschoolers had the lowest (113.7 ± 27.3 vs 80.9 ± 23.8; P < .001). The overall prevalence of DLD was 35.9% among all the studied children. Maternal education levels revealed a significant association, with a higher percentage of mothers in the DLD group having lower education levels compared with the non-DLD group (P = .035). A significant difference was related to the child's nutrition, as 25.3% of children in the DLD group were breastfed compared with 45.4% who were bottle-fed (P = .001). DLD affects nearly one-third of the studied sample in the Aseer region, Saudi Arabia, and it was linked to maternal education and feeding practices. Implementaion of ommunity-based screening and intervention programs are necessary to reduce the burden of DLD.
Copyright © 2025 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Full Text Sources:
Miscellaneous:
Full Text Sources:
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.