Citizen science approaches in the development of post-stroke physical activity interventions: A scoping review.

Rhoda Schuling, Rienk Dekker, Leonie A Krops, Johan de Jong, Martijn Bakker

Journal: PloS one 2025;20(8):e0329948

PMID: 40834020

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stroke is a major cause of disability globally, with high recurrence rates despite the implementation of secondary prevention strategies. Promoting physical activity and reducing sedentary behaviour are critical to mitigate these risks. Collaborative research approaches, including citizen science, offer promising methods for developing more effective and sustainable interventions by leveraging patient insights and lived experiences across different research stages.

OBJECTIVES

This scoping review explored the application of citizen science approaches in developing interventions targeting physical activity and sedentary behaviour for people with stroke.

METHODS

Following Arksey and O'Malley's framework and the PRISMA-ScR checklist, five databases were searched. We included empirical studies involving stroke patients in research on physical activity or sedentary behaviour interventions. Data was extracted on terminology, collaboration methods, and participant roles and analysed using the Participation Matrix framework. Methodological rigor was assessed using the CASP qualitative checklist.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were included, most published after 2020 and originating from diverse countries. Terms like "co-design," "co-creation," and "patient and public involvement" were prevalent, but "citizen science" was not explicitly mentioned. Methods for active involvement of stroke patients included focus groups, workshops, and advisory panels. Stroke patients primarily participated as advisors or partners during intervention design, with minimal involvement in early research stages, data analysis, or dissemination. Researchers predominantly held decision-making roles.

CONCLUSIONS

Citizen science in stroke research is still developing, with limited patient involvement across research phases. Expanding the depth and scope of patient involvement could enhance the relevance and long-term impact of interventions.

Copyright: © 2025 Bakker et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Address: Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.; School of Sport Studies, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands.; School of Sport Studies, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands.; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.; School of Sport Studies, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands.; Department of Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.