Assessment of measurement uncertainty of immunoassays and LC-MS/MS methods for serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D.

Markus Herrmann, Harjit P Bhattoa, Samuel D Vasikaran, Etienne Cavalier, Annemieke C Heijboer, Giovanni Lombardi, Vincent Delatour, Katleen Van Uytfanghe, Konstantinos Makris, Niklas Rye Jørgensen, Richard Pikner, Pierre Lukas, Callum G Fraser

Journal: Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 2025;63(10):1981-1991

PMID: 40785082

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Accurate 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-(OH)D) assays are essential for defining vitamin D status and ensuring appropriate clinical decisions. Standardization efforts, including the Vitamin D Standardization Program (VDSP), aim to minimize assay variability. This study evaluates the measurement uncertainty (MU) of various 25-(OH)D assays and their ability to detect physiologically relevant changes over time.

METHODS

Seventeen pooled and eight single-donor serum samples were analyzed using two LC-MS/MS methods and 13 immunoassays, each applied in two independent laboratories. Imprecision, bias, and MU were assessed relative to the University of Ghent's reference measurement procedure (RMP). Results were compared against analytical performance specifications (APS) from VDSP, JCTLM-TF-RMSI, and IFCC C-BM based on physiological 25-(OH)D variation. A graphical approach was introduced to visualize MU in relation to clinical relevance.

RESULTS

LC-MS/MS methods consistently met all APS criteria. Several immunoassays also achieved acceptable MU, although significant bias or inter-laboratory variability was observed for some of them. Slightly more than half of the assays met the desirable Joint Committee for Traceability in Laboratory Medicine Task Force on Reference Measurement System Implementation (JCTLM TF-RMSI) MU threshold (≤10 %), while four exceeded the minimum acceptable limit (≤15 %). The IFCC C-BM physiological approach identified a similar subset of assays. The graphical representation effectively illustrated method reliability across the tested concentration range.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement uncertainty remains a major challenge for 25-(OH)D assays. The integration of MU-based APS and graphical visualization provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating assay performance. These findings highlight the importance of selecting assays capable of reliably detecting clinically meaningful changes in vitamin D status.

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.

Address: Department of Clinical Chemistry, University of Liège, CIRM, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium.; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Endocrine Laboratory, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.; Laboratory of Experimental Biochemistry, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy.; Laboratoire National de Métrologie et D'Essais (LNE), Paris, France.; Department of Bioanalysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ref4U-Laboratory of Toxicology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.; Laboratory for the Research of Musculoskeletal System "Th. Garofalidis", School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.; Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.; Clinical Institute of Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.; Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Bone metabolism, Klatovska Hospital, Klatovy, Czech Republic.; Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Haematology, Faculty of Medicine Pilsen, Charles University Prague, Pilsen, Czech Republic.; Faculty of Health Care Studies, University of West Bohemia, Pilsen, Czech Republic.; PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, WA, Australia.; Population Health and Genomics, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.