Embryo metabolism as a novel non-invasive preimplantation test: nutrients turn over and metabolomic analysis of human spent embryo culture media (SECM).

AliReza Alizadeh Moghadam Masouleh, Poopak Eftekhari-Yazdi, Amin Ebrahimi Sadrabadi, Reza Jafarzadeh Esfehani, Monica Tobler, Sven Schuchardt, Luca Gianaroli, Andreas Schmutzler

Journal: Human reproduction update 2025;31(5):405-444

PMID: 40690766

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Single embryo transfer is globally recommended during IVF treatments. Hence, there is a growing demand for better embryo selection. Additionally, to morphology and genetics, nutrient uptake/release and metabolome profiles in spent embryo culture media (SECM) are proposed as non-invasive biomarkers. Are they ready to be applied for clinical purposes?

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

We reviewed methods of metabolism analysis for embryos, focusing on human SECM.

SEARCH METHODS

Until November 2024, the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Google Scholar were surfed for peer-reviewed English-language studies in the human, with MeSH terms and keywords: ART, IVF, ICSI, aneuploidy, embryo transfer, embryo selection, culture media, metabolome, metabolomics, metabolic profile, artificial intelligence (AI), nutrients, carbohydrates, glucose, pyruvate, lactate, amino acids (AAs), fatty acids (FAs), and spent embryo culture medium (SECM). Also, the reference lists of all relevant articles were searched.

OUTCOMES

Forty-nine original publications (1989-2024) were found in which SECM samples were collected from 20 countries, focusing on preimplantation embryo metabolism single biomarker(s) of energy sources (glucose and pyruvate), AAs and free FAs (17 studies), or metabolomic analysis (32 studies). Focal points were blastocyst development, aneuploidy, embryo sex prediction, implantation, and pregnancy outcome. Eleven major companies, which supply embryo culture media, dominate the market. Nutrient composition of their culture media presents major challenges because they are not normally disclosed. In single-biomarker(s) studies, eight studies focus on glucose and pyruvate, eight on AAs, both alone and in combination with glucose or pyruvate, and their ratios. Since the absolute quantities of some AAs or glucose levels were reported in some studies, they all have the potential to become future biomarkers for clinical application. In metabolomics studies, almost all studies reported qualitative results, such as decrease/increase or the metabolite ratios. For absolute concentrations, the basal concentrations of the culture media must be considered. In sum, all differences in the experimental design, the platforms, and the results were analyzed.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

Establishing a unified guideline for the reporting of metabolomics studies and a specific guideline outlining the minimum information required for SECM experiment publication will ensure that future studies provide all necessary and critical information. The metabolomics studies primarily focused on implantation and pregnancy, whereas we, as a first step, preferred multi-omics studies on absolute concentrations of metabolites of good vs poor quality and euploid vs aneuploid embryos. Following this step, these quantitative approaches might lead to more convincing successes. If small numbers of predictive biomarkers were identified, a simple, rapid, and cheap test could be developed for each medium, clinically performed in the fertility center. Furthermore, further research on basal media ingredients is needed, combined with targeted metabolomics. The future could be an integration of all-primarily non-invasive-information, omics, and other, by AI.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

The review protocol is registered on the OSF platform: https://osf.io/mxtbg.

© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected] for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact [email protected].

Address: Department of Embryology, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.; gyn-medicum, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Göttingen, Germany.; Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.; Department of Basic and Population Based Studies in NCD, Reproductive Epidemiology Research Center, Royan Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.; Department of Embryology, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.; Department of Stem Cells and Developmental Biology, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACER, Tehran, Iran.; Blood Borne Infections Research Center, Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research (ACECR), Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran.; gyn-medicum, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Göttingen, Germany.; Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, Hannover, Germany.; International Institute of Reproductive Medicine, IIRM, Lugano, Switzerland.; Interdisciplinary Institute of Reproductive Medicine, Next Fertility Gynepro - Bologna, Italy.; gyn-medicum, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Göttingen, Germany.; University Women's Hospital, Christian-Albrecht-University, Kiel, Germany.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.