Routine versus no assessment of gastric residual volumes in preterm infants receiving enteral feeding via intermittent feeding tubes: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether eliminating routine gastric residual volume (GRV) assessments would lead to quicker attainment of full feeding volumes in preterm infants.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a prospective randomized controlled trial of infants ≤32 weeks gestation and birthweight ≤1250 g admitted to a tertiary care NICU. Infants were randomized to assess or not assess GRV before enteral tube feedings. The primary outcome was time to attain full enteral feeding volume defined as 120 ml/kg/day. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare the days to reach full enteral feeds between the two groups.

RESULTS

80 infants were randomized, 39 to the GRV assessing and 41 to the No-GRV assessing group. A predetermined interim analysis at 50% enrollment showed no difference in primary outcome and the study was stopped as recommended by the Data Safety Monitoring Committee. There was no significant difference in median days to reach full enteral feeds between the two groups [GRV assessment: 12d (5) vs. No-GRV assessment:13d (9)]. There was no mortality in either group, one infant in each group developed necrotizing enterocolitis stage 2 or greater.

CONCLUSION

Eliminating the practice of gastric residual volume assessment before feeding did not result in shorter time to attain full feeding.