Culture-directed antibiotics in peritoneal dialysis solutions: a systematic review focused on stability and compatibility.

Chau Wei Ling, Kamal Sud, Rahul Patel, Gregory Peterson, Troy Wanandy, Siang Fei Yeoh, Connie Van, Ronald Castelino

Journal: Journal of nephrology 2023;36(7):1841-1859

PMID: 37548827

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This systematic review summarises the stability of less commonly prescribed antibiotics in different peritoneal dialysis solutions that could be used for culture-directed therapy of peritonitis, which would be especially useful in regions with a high prevalence of multidrug antibiotic-resistant strains.

METHODS

A literature search of Medline, Scopus, Embase and Google Scholar for articles published from inception to 25 January, 2023 was conducted. Only antibiotic stability studies conducted in vitro and not recently reviewed by So et al. were included. The main outcomes were chemical, physical, antimicrobial and microbial stability. This protocol was registered in PROSPERO (registration number CRD42023393366).

RESULTS

We screened 1254 abstracts, and 28 articles were included in the study. In addition to those discussed in a recent systematic review (So et al., Clin Kidney J 15(6):1071-1078, 2022), we identified 18 antimicrobial agents. Of these, 9 have intraperitoneal dosing recommendations in the recent International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) peritonitis guidelines, and 7 of the 9 had stability data applicable to clinical practice. They were cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, daptomycin, ofloxacin, and teicoplanin in glucose-based solutions, tobramycin in Extraneal solution only and fosfomycin in Extraneal, Nutrineal, Physioneal 1.36% and 2.27% glucose solutions.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicochemical stability has not been demonstrated for all antibiotics with intraperitoneal dosing recommendations in the ISPD peritonitis guidelines. Further studies are required to determine the stability of antibiotics, especially in icodextrin-based and low-glucose degradation products, pH-neutral solutions.

© 2023. The Author(s).

Address: Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia. [email protected].; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.; Nepean Kidney Research Centre, Department of Renal Medicine, Nepean Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.; Peritoneal Dialysis Unit, Regional Dialysis Centre, Blacktown Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.; School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.; Department of Pharmacy, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, TAS, Australia.; Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, TAS, Australia.; Department of Pharmacy, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.; Department of Pharmacy, Blacktown Hospital, Blacktown, NSW, Australia.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.