Evaluation of contrast sensitivity in non-high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy treated with panretinal photocoagulation with and without intravitreal injections of ranibizumab.

Zubir S Rentiya, Daniel A Ferraz, Robert Hutnik, Junun Bae, Cleide G Machado, Cristina Mucciolli, Augusto Alves L da Motta, Lucas Z Ribeiro, Zeyu Guan, Rony Carlos Preti, Walter Y Takahashi

Journal: Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia 2021;85(1):37-45

PMID: 34586227

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate contrast sensitivity in non-high-risk, treatment-naïve proliferative diabetic retinopathy patients treated with panretinal photocoagulation and intravitreal injections of ranibizumab) versus panretinal photocoagulation alone.

METHODS

Sixty eyes of 30 patients with bilateral proliferative diabetic retinopathy were randomized into two groups: one received panretinal photocoagulation and ranibizumab injections (study group), while the other received panretinal photocoagulation alone (control group). All eyes were treated with panretinal photocoagulation in three sessions according to the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study guidelines. Contrast sensitivity measurements were performed under photopic conditions (85 cd/m2) with the Visual Contrast Test Sensitivity 6500 chart, allowing for the evaluation of five spatial frequencies with sine wave grating charts: 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 12.0, and 18.0 cycles per degree (cpd). Outcomes were measured in contrast sensitivity threshold scores among and within groups, from baseline to 1, 3, and 6 months.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight eyes (28 in the study group and 30 in the control group) reached the study endpoint. A comparative analysis of changes in contrast sensitivity between the groups showed significant differences mainly in low frequencies as follows: at month 1 in 1.5 cpd (p=0.001) and 3.0 cpd (p=0.04); at month 3 in 1.5 cpd (p=0.016), and at month 6 in 1.5 cpd (p=0.001) and 3.0 cpd (p=0.026) in favor of the study group.

CONCLUSIONS

In eyes of patients with non-high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy, panretinal photocoagulation treatment with ranibizumab appears to cause less damage to contrast sensitivity compared with panretinal photocoagulation treatment alone. Thus, our evaluation of contrast sensitivity may support the use of ranabizumab as an adjuvant to panretinal photocoagulation for the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Address: Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Neurology, Ophthalmology, Baltimore, MD, USA.; Division of Ophthalmology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.; Division of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP,Brazil.; Moorfield's Eye Hospital, London, UK.; Stony Brook Medicine, Department of Surgery, Stony Brook, NY, USA.; Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Erie, PA, USA.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.