Critical appraisal and meta-analysis of biological variation estimates for kidney related analytes.

Abdurrahman Coskun, Aasne K Aarsand, Sverre Sandberg, Margarita Simón, Carmen Perich, Joana Minchinela, Elisabet Gonzalez-Lao, Pilar Fernández-Calle, Jorge Diaz-Garzón, Niels Jonker, Anna Carobene, Federica Braga, William Bartlett, Virtudes Alvarez, Carmen Ricós, Fernando Marqués-García, Beatriz Boned, Berna Aslan

Journal: Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 2022;60(4):469-478

PMID: 32970605

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Kidney markers are some of the most frequently used laboratory tests in patient care, and correct clinical decision making depends upon knowledge and correct application of biological variation (BV) data. The aim of this study was to review available BV data and to provide updated BV estimates for the following kidney markers in serum and plasma; albumin, creatinine, cystatin C, chloride, potassium, sodium and urea.

CONTENT

Relevant studies were identified from a historical BV database as well as by systematic literature searches. Retrieved publications were appraised by the Biological Variation Data Critical Appraisal Checklist (BIVAC). Meta-analyses of BIVAC compliant studies with similar design were performed to deliver global estimates of within-subject (CV) and between-subject (CV) BV estimates. Out of the 61 identified papers, three received a BIVAC grade A, four grade B, 48 grade C, five grade D grade and one was not appraised as it did not report numerical BV estimates. Most studies were identified for creatinine (n=48). BV estimates derived from the meta-analysis were in general lower than previously reported estimates for all analytes except urea. For some measurands, BV estimates may be influenced by age or states of health, but further data are required.

SUMMARY

This review provides updated global BV estimates for kidney related measurands. For all measurands except for urea, these estimates were lower than previously reported.

OUTLOOK

For the measurands analyzed in this review, there are sufficient well-designed studies available to publish a trustworthy estimate of BV. However, for a number of newly appearing kidney markers no suitable data is available and additional studies are required.

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.

Address: Certe-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis Assen, Assen, The Netherlands.; Institute for Quality Management in Healthcare (IQMH), Centre for Proficiency Testing, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.; Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEQCML), Analytical Quality Commission, Barcelona, Spain.; Royo Villanova Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain.; Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.; School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, UK.; Research Centre for Metrological Traceability in Laboratory Medicine (CIRME), University of Milan, Milan, Italy.; Servizio Medicina di Laboratorio, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.; Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, School of Medicine, Atasehir, Istanbul, Turkey.; Department of Laboratory Medicine, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.; Quality Healthcare Consulting, Grupo ACMS, Madrid, Spain.; Metropolitana Nord Unified Laboratory (LUMN), Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Badalona, Spain.; Consortium of Laboratory Intercomarcal Alt Penedès and Garraf l'Anoia, Vilafranca del Penedès, Spain.; Norwegian Porphyria Centre, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.; Norwegian Organization for Quality Improvement of Laboratory Examinations (NOKLUS), Haraldsplass Deaconess Hospital, Bergen, Norway.; Department of Global Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Link outs

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.