Which amphetamine-type stimulants can be detected by oral fluid immunoassays?

Daniele Z Souza, Paula O Boehl, Eloisa Comiran, Débora S Prusch, Ivomar Zancanaro, Alexandre M Fuentefria, Flavio Pechansky, Paulina C A V Duarte, Raquel B De Boni, Pedro E Fröehlich, Renata P Limberger

Journal: Therapeutic drug monitoring 2012;34(1):98-109

PMID: 22249346

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The use of oral fluid for monitoring drug consumption on roads has many advantages over conventional biological fluids; therefore, several immunoassays have been developed for this purpose. In this work, the ability of 3 commercial immunoassays to detect amphetamine-type stimulants (ATSs) in oral fluid was assessed. In addition, it was reviewed the main controlled ATSs available worldwide, as well as the oral fluid immunological screening tests that have been used for identifying ATSs in drivers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The analytical specificity of amphetamine direct enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), methamphetamine direct ELISA (Immunalysis Corporation), and Oral-View saliva multidrug of abuse test (Alfa Scientific Designs) was evaluated using ATS-spiked oral fluid. Legislation and published articles that report the use of immunological screening tests to detect ATS consumption in conductors were reviewed, including the kit's technical information, project reports, police and drug databases.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Even at high concentrations, the tested assays were not able to detect methylphenidate, fenproporex, or diethylpropion, controlled ATSs legally marketed in many countries.

CONCLUSIONS

This evidences the need to develop new kits that enable one to control the misuse of prescription ATSs on roads through oral fluid immunoassays.

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.