Igg Food Antibody Guided Elimination-Rotation Diet Was More Effective than FODMAP Diet and Control Diet in the Treatment of Women with Mixed IBS-Results from an Open Label Study.

None

• After implementing the three diets, among patients with IBS-M, a statistically significant reduction of the frequency of the idiopathic abdominal pain, abdominal pain after a meal, abdominal pain during defecation, and sensation of incomplete defecation before and after the diet plans, were only found in Group 2.
• Significantly, only in the Group 2 IgG based elimination-rotation-diet was there a high decrease or complete disappearance of dyspeptic IBS symptoms and co-morbidities together with IBS symptoms.
• This study shows that a personalised dietary approach is more effective in treating IBS than generalised diet recommendations, with elimination diets focused on IgG antibodies providing the best results.

Science supports the use of a low-FODMAP diet for symptom relief of IBS. However, more recently evidence suggests that IBS is a low-grade inflammatory disease that may result from or lead to IgG-dependent food hyper-sensitivities.

This study compared the effectiveness of three dietary treatment plans in 73 female patients diagnosed with mixed-form IBS based on Rome III criteria and no other gastrointestinal condition over 8 weeks.

The 3 dietary groups were:

• Group 1-low FODMAP diet
• Group 2- IgG based elimination-rotation-diet
• Group 3-control diet (control group)

Diets of G1 and G2 were determined individually by a dietitian, based on low-FODMAP dietary information and results from IgG food sensitivity testing respectively. Group 3 received nutrition advice from a gastroenterologist.

In G1, some of the IBS symptoms significantly improved (mucus in stool, p = 0.031; bloating, p < 0.001). Gurgling sensation and gastric fullness also reach statistical significance in G1.

IBS symptoms as well as co-morbid symptoms significantly improved or disappeared completely in G2 (idiopathic abdominal pain, p < 0.001; abdominal pain after a meal, p < 0.001; abdominal pain during defecation, p = 0.008; sensation of incomplete defecation p = 0.001; difficulty to defecate (constipation) p = 0.002; bloating p = < 0.001; gurgling sensation < 0.001; gastric fullness p = < 0.001. However, blood and mucus in the stool were impossible to test because the symptoms were not reported by any patient during the 2nd examination). (p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant).

In group G3 no statistically significant improvements were seen in any measure.

Based on the results of this open-label study, it was concluded that personalised dietary interventions were more effective in the treatment of IBS-M patients than generalised diet recommendations. Dietary elimination based on IgG food sensitivity test results had the greatest impact on IBS and related symptoms.This study supports results from other studies showing an IgG-guided diet as an effective strategy in co-morbid conditions such as fatigue, headache/migraine, and skin conditions.

Conflicts of Interest C.F.J.L., M.G. and A.B. are employees of the Institute of Microecology in Poznan ,where the ImuPro tests were determined. D.T. is the Head of Laboratory and shareholder of Lab1, offering ImuPro tests in Norway.

• Low FODMAP diets studies (NICE) showed GI improvements for abdominal pain, abdominal cramps, diarrhoea, gas, and bloating, largely because FODMAPs mainly cause an excessive production of gas, leading to discomfort and pain and an increased osmotic effect leading to increased bowel movement and diarrhoea. However 30% of patients still suffered from bloating on the FODMAP diet. Gurgling sensation decreased from 65% to 15%, and gastric fullness decreased from 58% to 11% in the patients on the low FODMAP diet.
• A potential new approach to resolve functional symptoms of gastrointestinal conditions could be to start with an IgG-guided elimination diet, as it was proven to be the more effective diet in this open study, and in cases of persistent symptoms, it could be combined with a low-FODMAP diet.
• Calprotectin is currently one of the best-known diagnostic markers indicating mucosa inflammation and changes in the inflammation intensity. In this study serious intestinal inflammation was diagnosed at the faecal calprotectin concentration of >50 mg/kg of stool. During the first examination, no statistically significant differences were found in calprotectin concentrations between the compared groups of patients, and the values were low, suggesting that the included patients suffered from low-grade inflammation and were suitable for diet alteration as the best choice of treatment.

Limitations:

• The main limitations of this study are the open-labeled nature, the low number of participants and the bias of only including female participants with only the patients in the G2 group tested for IgG food antibodies.
• Foods consumed by the patients before they entered the study were not ascertained.

• Claims that IgG food antibodies only reveal exposure to food and not intolerance should be reinvestigated in larger double-blinded studies.