Systematic Review of Gut Microbiota and Major Depression.

Stephanie G Cheung, Ariel R Goldenthal, Anne-Catrin Uhlemann, J John Mann, Jeffrey M Miller, M Elizabeth Sublette

Journal: Frontiers in psychiatry 2019;10():34

PMID: 30804820

Plain Language Summary

plain language summary logo

A growing body of research points to a possible association between the gut microbiome and major depressive disorder (MDD). The gut microbiome is a collection of trillions of microorganisms, including different taxonomic groups of bacteria. The aim of this review is to assess the literature to identify the relationship between the gut microbiome composition and MDD and to highlight potential metabolic mechanisms contributing to the development of MDD. Six eligible studies demonstrated significant differences in gut microbiome composition between MDD and control groups. While the composition differed between the two groups, there was no consensus on which specific bacteria taxa are most relevant to MDD. Based on these results, the authors conclude the data is very limited and the impact of microbiome differences related to depression is currently unclear. They propose future studies should look beyond taxonomic classification and investigate microbial functioning to provide a larger-scale understanding of how the gut microbiome contributes to the development of MDD.

Abstract

Recently discovered relationships between the gastrointestinal microbiome and the brain have implications for psychiatric disorders, including major depressive disorder (MDD). Bacterial transplantation from MDD patients to rodents produces depression-like behaviors. In humans, case-control studies have examined the gut microbiome in healthy and affected individuals. We systematically reviewed existing studies comparing gut microbial composition in MDD and healthy volunteers. A PubMed literature search combined the terms "depression," "depressive disorder," "stool," "fecal," "gut," and "microbiome" to identify human case-control studies that investigated relationships between MDD and microbiota quantified from stool. We evaluated the resulting studies, focusing on bacterial taxa that were different between MDD and healthy controls. Six eligible studies were found in which 50 taxa exhibited differences ( < 0.05) between patients with MDD and controls. Patient characteristics and methodologies varied widely between studies. Five phyla-, and -were represented; however, divergent results occurred across studies for all phyla. The largest number of differentiating taxa were within phylum , in which nine families and 12 genera differentiated the diagnostic groups. The majority of these families and genera were found to be statistically different between the two groups in two identified studies. Family differentiated the diagnostic groups in four studies (with an even split in directionality). Across all five phyla, nine genera were higher in MDD (, and ), six were lower (, and ), and six were divergent (, and ). We highlight mechanisms and products of bacterial metabolism as they may relate to the etiology of depression. No consensus has emerged from existing human studies of depression and gut microbiome concerning which bacterial taxa are most relevant to depression. This may in part be due to differences in study design. Given that bacterial functions are conserved across taxonomic groups, we propose that studying microbial functioning may be more productive than a purely taxonomic approach to understanding the gut microbiome in depression.

Address: Division of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.; Molecular Imaging & Neuropathology Area, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, United States.; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.; Microbiome & Pathogen Genomics Core, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.; Department of Radiology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.