Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Health Anxiety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Kate Cooper, James D Gregory, Ian Walker, Sinead Lambe, Paul M Salkovskis

Journal: Behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy 2017;45(2):110-123

PMID: 28229805

Plain Language Summary

Hypochondriasis is characterised by preoccupation with the belief that one has, or could acquire, a serious illness, emanating from “anxiety about the meaning, significance or cause” of their symptoms. The main aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for clinical and subclinical health anxiety (HA) relative to control conditions, focusing on measures of HA, depression and anxiety pre and post intervention, and assessing the quality of the randomized control trials. This study is a systemic review and meta-analysis which included 14 studies in the final analysis with a total of 1544 participants. Results provide evidence supporting CBT treatment of HA, in people with and without medical problems, and in people with subclinical as well as clinical levels of HA. Authors conclude that further investigation is required in order to delineate the active treatment elements.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health anxiety (HA), or hypochondriasis, is a psychological problem characterized by a preoccupation with the belief that one is physically unwell. A 2007 Cochrane review (Thomson and Page, 2007) found cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) to be an effective intervention for individuals with HA. Similar findings were reported in a recent meta-analysis (Olatunji et al., 2014), which did not employ a systematic search strategy. The current review aimed to investigate the efficacy of CBT for HA, and to update the existing reviews.

METHOD

A systematic search was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidance, including randomized controlled trials that compared CBT with a control condition for people with HA. Five hundred and sixty-seven studies were found in the original search, of which 14 were included in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis was conducted on 21 comparisons and a large effect size for CBT compared with a control condition was found at post therapy d = 1.01 (95% confidence interval 0.77-1.25), as well as at 6- and 12-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis provides support for the hypothesis that CBT is an effective intervention for HA when compared with a variety of control conditions, e.g. treatment-as-usual, waiting list, medication, and other psychological therapies.

Address: Department of Psychology,University of Bath,Claverton Down,Bath BA2 7AY.

DOI: 10.1017/S1352465816000527