Jake Linardon, John Gleeson, Keong Yap, Kylie Murphy, Leah Brennan
Journal: Cognitive behaviour therapy 2020;48(1):15-38
PMID: 30307377
None
Third wave behavioural interventions are increasing in popularity and this meta-analysis provides evidence that they may be useful in both eating disorder treatment and prevention. Eating disorders have a complex and poorly understood aetiology, which makes their treatment and prevention a challenge for public health. Third-wave interventions for eating prevention disorders provide a promising approach that can be delivered through various means including digitally.
Prevention of eating disorders is likely to be more cost-effective than treatment, and practitioners should be mindful of considering third-wave interventions in their client referrals. This should include those at risk of eating disorders (e.g. displaying a poor body image) as well as those with these conditions.
As third wave interventions increase in popularity, further evidence is needed in the form of robust and valid trials to explore their value - particularly in terms of eating disorder prevention. Research is also needed on their application alongside other traditional therapies including those involving nutrition interventions.

Third-wave behavioural interventions are increasingly popular for treating and preventing mental health conditions. Recently, researchers have begun testing whether these interventions can effectively targeting eating disorder risk factors (disordered eating, body image concerns). This meta-analysis examined whether third-wave behavioural interventions (acceptance and commitment therapy; dialectical behaviour therapy; mindfulness-based interventions; compassion-focused therapy) show potential for being effective eating disorder prevention programs, by testing their effects on eating disorder risk factors in samples without an eating disorder. Twenty-four studies (13 randomized trials) were included. Most studies delivered selective prevention programs (i.e. participants who reported elevated risk factor). Third-wave interventions led to significant pre-post (g = 0.59; 95% CI = 0.43, 0.75) and follow-up (g = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.38, 1.28) improvements in disordered eating, and significant pre-post improvements in body image (g = 0.35; 95% CI = 0.13, 0.56). DBT-based interventions were associated with the largest effects. Third-wave interventions were also significantly more efficacious than wait-lists (g = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.09, 0.69) in reducing disordered eating, but did not differ to other interventions (g = 0.25; 95% CI = -0.06, 0.57). Preliminary evidence suggests that third-wave interventions may have a beneficial effect in ameliorating eating disorder risk.
Full Text Sources:
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.