Impact of implementation intentions on physical activity practice in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Marco Antonio Vieira da Silva, Thaís Moreira São-João, Valéria Cândido Brizon, Décio Henrique Franco, Fábio Luiz Mialhe

Journal: PloS one 2019;13(11):e0206294

PMID: 30427874

Plain Language Summary

plain language summary logo

Many behavioural interventions have been implemented in order to increase physical activity levels among adults. Despite these efforts, there is often a large gap between setting goals and attaining goals. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of using theory-based strategies on goal attainment in promoting physical activity among adults (specifically implementation intentions or if-then planning). Particular interest was given to the impact of reinforcements during the intervention and follow-up period for coping with obstacles. A total of 13 randomised controlled trials were included. Implementation intentions consisted of two strategies. Firstly, action planning which was designed to increase awareness of possible future situations where behaviours could be achieved. Secondly, coping planning which focused on barriers that might impede the goal behaviour, and ways to overcome these possible barriers. According to the current literature, application of the theory-based goal setting promoted physical activity behaviours, and this was heightened among those who received reinforcement of plans to increase physical activity during the follow-up period.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to verify the efficacy of using theory-based strategies on implementation intentions in promoting physical activity (PA) among adults.

METHODS

This review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA recommendations. The search was carried out in seven electronic databases (LILACS, PubMed, SciELO, Cochrane, Web of Science) and two searches of the "grey literature" were performed (Openthesis and OpenGrey). Randomized clinical trials (RCT), published up to September 2016, were considered eligible for this study. Two reviewers independently and systematically evaluated the eligibility criteria, and performed data extraction. A meta-analysis was performed for the purpose of comparing the effect between the intervention and control groups. The effect sizes were grouped in two subgroups with the purpose of more accurately verifying the effect caused by reinforcing the implementation intentions strategy, and using the inverse variance statistical method with random effects models to estimate the main effect of the implementation intention strategy on the PA behavior. Heterogeneity among the studies was evaluated by using I-square statistics, and the Jadad scale to evaluate the quality of included papers.

RESULTS

The search resulted in 12,147 records, of which 13 RCTs were considered eligible for this review. Sample age ranged from 18 to 76 years, and participants had conditions such as medullary lesion, coronary disease, obesity, diabetes mellitus, sedentarism or occupational stress. When the summary of the effect was analyzed in the meta-analysis, the result found in the subgroup with reinforcement of the implementation intentions strategy was 0.25 (IC 95% = 0.05-0.45) in favor of the intervention group. This demonstrated that application of the implementation intentions strategy was capable of increasing PA practice in the participants of these studies, in comparison with others that did not use this reinforcement.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this review indicated that application of the theory of implementation intentions promoted PA behavior among the adults who received reinforcement of this strategy. The systematic review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database under the number CRD42018090482.

Address: Department of Community Dentistry, University of Campinas, Piracicaba Dental School, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.; School of Nursing, University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.