Claudia Sikorski, Melanie Luppa, Marie Kaiser, Heide Glaesmer, Georg Schomerus, Hans-Helmut König, Steffi G Riedel-Heller
Journal: BMC public health 2012;11():661
PMID: 21859493
Obesity rates are still rising and, in addition to co-morbid diseases, perceived discrimination and stigmatisation leads to worse outcomes in obese individuals. The aim of this systematic review, including seven studies, was to investigate how the lay public perceive people with obesity or overweight (stigmatizing attitudes); (b) what they attribute obesity to (causal attribution) and (c) what types of interventions they support. Higher rates of stigmatising attitudes were associated with attributing obesity more to behaviour and less to heredity, lower levels of education and older age of the respondents, and not seeing obesity as an illness. Causal attributions varied slightly from study to study but most found that lack of activity behaviour, overeating and lack of willpower were the most prevalent causal attributions, with more than two thirds of respondents associating these factors to obesity, whilst only about a third agreed to heredity being an important factor. Environmental factors, in particular a bad food environment, was seen as a possible factor in obesity by about half of the respondents. In terms of prevention efforts, support was highest for childhood prevention and information campaigns, followed by banning junk foods in schools and banning junk food advertising, whilst taxation of unhealthy foods received the least support.
BACKGROUND
Up to this date, prevalence rates of obesity are still rising. Aside from co-morbid diseases, perceived discrimination and stigmatization leads to worsen outcomes in obese individuals. Higher stigmatizing attitudes towards obese individuals may also result in less support of preventive and interventive measures. In light of the immense burden of obesity on health care systems and also on the individuals' quality of life, accepted and subsidized preventive measures are needed. Policy support might be determined by views of the lay public on causes of obesity and resulting weight stigma. This study seeks to answer how representative samples of the lay public perceive people with obesity or overweight status (stigmatizing attitudes); what these samples attribute obesity to (causal attribution) and what types of interventions are supported by the lay public and which factors determine that support (prevention support).
METHODS
A systematic literature search was conducted. All studies of representative samples reporting results on (a) stigmatizing attitudes towards overweight and obese individuals, (b) causal beliefs and (c) prevention support were included.
RESULTS
Only 7 articles were found. One study reported prevalence rates of stigmatizing attitudes. About a quarter of the population in Germany displayed definite stigmatizing attitudes. Other studies reported causal attributions. While external influences on weight are considered as well, it seems that internal factors are rated to be of higher importance. Across the studies found, regulative prevention is supported by about half of the population, while childhood prevention has highest approval rates. Results on sociodemographic determinants differ substantially.
CONCLUSIONS
Further research on public attitudes toward and perception of overweight and obesity is urgently needed to depict the prevailing degree of stigmatization. Introducing a multidimensional concept of the etiology of obesity to the lay public might be a starting point in stigma reduction.
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.